2018
DOI: 10.5194/amt-11-441-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hotplate precipitation gauge calibrations and field measurements

Abstract: Abstract. First introduced in 2003, approximately 70 YankeeEnvironmental Systems (YES) hotplate precipitation gauges have been purchased by researchers and operational meteorologists. A version of the YES hotplate is described in Rasmussen et al. (2011; R11). Presented here is testing of a newer version of the hotplate; this device is equipped with longwave and shortwave radiation sensors. Hotplate surface temperature, coefficients describing natural and forced convective sensible energy transfer, and radiativ… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At one of three ground sites (HP in Figs. 1a-b) we deployed a hotplate precipitation gauge (Rasmussen et al 2011;Zelasko et al 2018), a GPS receiver, and a data acquisition system. Once per second, the data system ingested a hotplate-generated data string, combined that with time-of-day from the GPS receiver (Coordinated Universal Time (UTC)), and recorded the merged hotplate/UTC data string.…”
Section: -Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At one of three ground sites (HP in Figs. 1a-b) we deployed a hotplate precipitation gauge (Rasmussen et al 2011;Zelasko et al 2018), a GPS receiver, and a data acquisition system. Once per second, the data system ingested a hotplate-generated data string, combined that with time-of-day from the GPS receiver (Coordinated Universal Time (UTC)), and recorded the merged hotplate/UTC data string.…”
Section: -Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithms used to process hotplate measurements are described in Rasmussen et al (2011), Boudala et al (2014), andZelasko et al (2018). Henceforth, these are referred to as R11, B14, and Z18, respectively.…”
Section: -Hotplate Gaugementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At one of three ground sites (HP in Fig. 1a and b) a hotplate precipitation gauge (Rasmussen et al, 2011;Zelasko et al, 2018), a GPS receiver, and a data acquisition system were deployed. Once per second, the data system ingested a hotplate-generated data string, combined that with time of day from the GPS receiver (Coordinated Universal Time, UTC), and recorded the merged hotplate-UTC data string.…”
Section: Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithms used to process hotplate measurements are described in Rasmussen et al (2011), Boudala et al (2014), and Zelasko et al (2018). Henceforth, these are referred to as R11, B14, and Z18, respectively.…”
Section: Hotplate Gaugementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also employed to investigate the correlation between precipitation and visibility (Gultepe and Milbrandt 2010) or the icing phenomenon (Wang et al 2019). The increasing use of the hotplate also increased the interest in evaluating and correcting the associated measurement biases, for example Zelasko et al (2018) evaluated the effects of longwave and shortwave radiation on the instrument performance, proposing an alternative algorithm to calculate precipitation intensity. Rasmussen et al (2011) derived a wind-speed-dependent collection efficiency related to the instrumental error of the hotplate, although not to its aerodynamic effect as investigated in the present work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%