2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11367-016-1113-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hotspot identification in the clothing industry using social life cycle assessment—opportunities and challenges of input-output modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…LCA can be used to evaluate the environmental and social impacts of textile and apparel from its life cycle perspective ( Moazzem et al, 2018 , Zamani et al, 2018 ). Woolridge et al (2006) study the performance of reuse or recycling of waste textiles by using LCA method from the energy-saving perspective.…”
Section: Identify Sustainable Practices In the Fscm Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…LCA can be used to evaluate the environmental and social impacts of textile and apparel from its life cycle perspective ( Moazzem et al, 2018 , Zamani et al, 2018 ). Woolridge et al (2006) study the performance of reuse or recycling of waste textiles by using LCA method from the energy-saving perspective.…”
Section: Identify Sustainable Practices In the Fscm Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, Zamani et al [27] suggest a cradle-to-gate input/output-based S-LCA, referred to the Swedish clothing consumption as a case study. The purpose is to investigate the influence of the cut-off rule and the definition of "hotspots" in social hotspot assessment.…”
Section: Literature Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social (29) were assessed by the companies as unsuitable (−, −) in terms of comparability and meaningfulness. The social aspects of Behavior in Competition (6), Hours of Work (13), Equal Opportunities (15) and Education and Training (18) were considered positively by the companies, as were the PDCA and performance indicators (+, +).…”
Section: Nomentioning
confidence: 99%