2012
DOI: 10.1586/erm.12.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hotspot oncomutations: implications for personalized cancer treatment

Abstract: Understanding the extent to which specific tumor mutations impact or mediate patient response to particular cancer therapies has become a rapidly increasing area of research. Recent research findings regarding four predominant mutational targets (KRAS, BRAF, EGFR and PIK3CA) show that these tumor mutations have predictive power for identifying which patients are likely to respond to particular therapies, and have prognostic significance irrespective of treatment. However, in this regard, the literature is freq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cancer hotspot mutations carry valuable information for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment [ 47 ]. In this cohort, total 10 mutations were found to be recurrently mutated in >1% patients accounting for 55.7% somatic mutations in AKT1 , PIK3CA and TP53 ( Table 4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancer hotspot mutations carry valuable information for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment [ 47 ]. In this cohort, total 10 mutations were found to be recurrently mutated in >1% patients accounting for 55.7% somatic mutations in AKT1 , PIK3CA and TP53 ( Table 4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Codon 12 is recognized as the “hotspot mutation region” having inherent instability and predisposition to single nucleotide substitutions (Myers et al 2012) with the result that majority of KRAS mutations occurs at this locus (Okudela et al 2010). It cannot be excluded that after one point mutation this region remains instable and prone to the occurrence of successive mutations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…180, 181 Smoking has also been shown to be a strong risk factor for synchronous primary colorectal cancers (R Nishihara et al, unpublished data) and synchronous multiple polyps, 182 especially serrated polyps, 183 which are recognized as precursors for colorectal cancers with CpG island methylator phenotype, microsatellite instability and/or BRAF mutation. 159, 184186 CpG island methylator phenotype-high, microsatellite instability-high and BRAF mutation can co-occur in colorectal cancer, 9, 30, 113, 184, 187195 and are common characteristics of synchronous colorectal cancers. 6770 Furthermore, synchronous primary colorectal cancers are considered to arise due to some form of predisposition, likely involving both genetic and environmental factors.…”
Section: The Genesis Of the “Etiologic Field Effect”mentioning
confidence: 99%