2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00113-019-0658-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

„Hounsfield units“ als Maß für die Knochendichte – Anwendungsmöglichkeiten in der Wirbelsäulenchirurgie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
12
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies suggest measurements of three different vertebrae, however. Furthermore, there is an ongoing scientific debate on the exact cutoff values for the differentiation between healthy, impaired and osteoporotic bone stock [41]. Data previously published by these authors, indicate that a 150 HU's seem to be a valid cut-off value for the differentiation between healthy and impaired bone quality [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies suggest measurements of three different vertebrae, however. Furthermore, there is an ongoing scientific debate on the exact cutoff values for the differentiation between healthy, impaired and osteoporotic bone stock [41]. Data previously published by these authors, indicate that a 150 HU's seem to be a valid cut-off value for the differentiation between healthy and impaired bone quality [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Choi et al defined ≤ 100 HUs as osteoporotic and Pickard et al, as well as Lee et al, defined ≤ 110 HUs as the threshold to characterize osteoporosis [9,10,16]. In a recent review article, Scheyerer et al focus on the value of the Hounsfield units as a measure of bone density and the possible applications in spinal surgery [17]. They emphasize on the measurement in clinical routine CT scans to early diagnose and treat osteoporosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, this method also has disadvantages, there is no standardization and the values are device-specific. Furthermore, the authors recommend three measurements within each vertebra (cranial, middle, caudal) and at least the evaluation of three vertebra [17]. Thus, this measurement is time consuming and we think routine use will be difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Klinische Studien zeigen eine signifikante Korrelation der Hounsfield-Einheiten zu T-Werten der DXA-Messung [7]. Aus den Hounsfield-Einheiten unterhalb der Deckplatte, mittig im Wirbelkörper und oberhalb der Grundplatte wird der Durchschnittswert erhoben.…”
Section: Osteoporoseunclassified
“…Aus den Hounsfield-Einheiten unterhalb der Deckplatte, mittig im Wirbelkörper und oberhalb der Grundplatte wird der Durchschnittswert erhoben. Bei Werten < 110 gilt eine Osteoporose als wahrscheinlich, bei > 160 als ausgeschlossen [7].…”
Section: Osteoporoseunclassified