2022
DOI: 10.5194/essd-14-2749-2022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hourly historical and near-future weather and climate variables for energy system modelling

Abstract: Abstract. Energy systems are becoming increasingly exposed to the impacts of weather and climate due to the uptake of renewable generation and the electrification of the heat and transport sectors. The need for high-quality meteorological data to manage present and near-future risks is urgent. This paper provides a comprehensive set of multi-decadal, time series of hourly meteorological variables and weather-dependent power system components for use in the energy systems modelling community. Despite the growin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examining the impact of climate change, we note that mean annual capacity factor under all future climate models is slightly reduced compared to historical (figure 2(a) shows reductions of 2.3%, (p = 0.003) averaged across all models, individual models shown in appendix b), with the climate change impact distinctly significant only during the summer months (summer = − 3.6% (p = 0.0003); winter = − 1.5% (p = 0.1559)) (figure 2(a)), as seen in Bloomfield et al's original study [35], as well as others [19,20]. Inter-model variation is low (see appendix b) however, a detailed analysis of the individual future climate models is not undertaken in this study.…”
Section: Variability In Wind Power Generation: From Inter-annual To D...supporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examining the impact of climate change, we note that mean annual capacity factor under all future climate models is slightly reduced compared to historical (figure 2(a) shows reductions of 2.3%, (p = 0.003) averaged across all models, individual models shown in appendix b), with the climate change impact distinctly significant only during the summer months (summer = − 3.6% (p = 0.0003); winter = − 1.5% (p = 0.1559)) (figure 2(a)), as seen in Bloomfield et al's original study [35], as well as others [19,20]. Inter-model variation is low (see appendix b) however, a detailed analysis of the individual future climate models is not undertaken in this study.…”
Section: Variability In Wind Power Generation: From Inter-annual To D...supporting
confidence: 58%
“…ERA5 data are initially bias corrected against Global Wind Atlas data [34] to account for sub-gridscale topographic effects. These bias-corrected wind speeds are then scaled to 92 m (average offshore turbine hub height in the UK in 2021) using a wind profile power law [35,36], before being passed through representative onshore and offshore wind farm power curves to provide the wind capacity factor at each ERA5 gridpoint and timestep.…”
Section: Wind Power Potential Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capacity value of interconnectors depends on the coincidence of stress events in interconnected regions, which is partially driven by the weather within those regions. This paper takes advantage of a 70-year reanalysis data set which has been developed specifically for use by energy system modellers [14]. Weather driven models of demand and renewable generation were developed; demand was modelled as a function of ambient temperature [15] whilst the renewable generation models were taken directly from [14].…”
Section: B Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper takes advantage of a 70-year reanalysis data set which has been developed specifically for use by energy system modellers [14]. Weather driven models of demand and renewable generation were developed; demand was modelled as a function of ambient temperature [15] whilst the renewable generation models were taken directly from [14]. Time-series of conventional generator available capacities were calculated using the models presented in [16].…”
Section: B Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation