1974
DOI: 10.1080/00222216.1974.11970176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hours of Work and the Demand For Outdoor Recreation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Son legión ya los autores que han aplicado en alguna de SLLS formas este tipo de razonamiento matemático, desde REILLY (1929) y STEWART (1947) y ZIPF (1949, pasando por VAN DOREN (1967), WOLFE (1972), McEVOY (1974, KLAASEN (1974), BIJKERK (1975), VAN LIER (1977), SMITH (1983) TALAYA (1987). La mayoría de ellos han puesto el acento en el papel de fricción de la variable distancia; SLE parámetros van desde el newtoniano d=-2 de Reilly, al d=-l de Stewart-Zipf, más propio de LUI país como Estados Unidos donde esta variable ejerce una fricción mucho menor; pocos sin embargo han ponderado otras variables socioeconómicas como hemos hecho en nuestro caso con la renta per cápita.…”
Section: Los Horizontes Evolutivos Del Flujo Potencialunclassified
“…Son legión ya los autores que han aplicado en alguna de SLLS formas este tipo de razonamiento matemático, desde REILLY (1929) y STEWART (1947) y ZIPF (1949, pasando por VAN DOREN (1967), WOLFE (1972), McEVOY (1974, KLAASEN (1974), BIJKERK (1975), VAN LIER (1977), SMITH (1983) TALAYA (1987). La mayoría de ellos han puesto el acento en el papel de fricción de la variable distancia; SLE parámetros van desde el newtoniano d=-2 de Reilly, al d=-l de Stewart-Zipf, más propio de LUI país como Estados Unidos donde esta variable ejerce una fricción mucho menor; pocos sin embargo han ponderado otras variables socioeconómicas como hemos hecho en nuestro caso con la renta per cápita.…”
Section: Los Horizontes Evolutivos Del Flujo Potencialunclassified
“…The trend toward the institutionalization of a 2 compressed workweek has been noted by a number of writers (Kando, 1975;McEvoy, 1974;Stevenson, 197^;Poor, 1972;Poor and Steele, 1972;Wheeler et al, 1972;Samuels, 1971î Faught, 1970Kahn and Wiemer, 1967;Wilensky, I96I;Kaplan, 196O;Faunce, 19^3;Long, 1958;Seligman, 195^)• While only about one percent of the nation's work force currently is on a 4-day schedule, the numerical increase in 4-day companies has been dramatic. In 1970» there were only 60 or 70 companies with either all, or a portion, of their employees on a 4-day week.…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Poor and Steele (1972), for example, found that 92 percent of the employees they surveyed on a 4-day workweek were either "pleased," or "very pleased," with this schedule. Similarly, 93 percent of McEvoy's (1974) respondents on a 4-day workweek stated that they "greatly preferred," or "generally preferred," a 4-day, to a 5-day, workweek.…”
Section: Employee Evaluations Of the 4-day Workweekmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research has indicated that workers tend to be more enthusiastic about a 4-day workweek after having had some experience with it 11 Dickinson andWijting, 1973» Poor andSteele, 1972;deGrazia, 1964). Once a 4-day workweek is implemented, general satisfaction of both employers and employees is evident (Goodale andAagard, 1975» Hilgert andHmdley, 1975;McEvoy, 1974;Dickinson andWijting, 1973» Nord andCostigan, 1973;Wheeler et al, 1972). Poor and Steele (1972), for example, found that 92 percent of the employees they surveyed on a 4-day workweek were either "pleased," or "very pleased," with this schedule.…”
Section: Employee Evaluations Of the 4-day Workweekmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation