2005
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Household cost-benefit equations and sustainable universal childhood immunisation: a randomised cluster controlled trial in south Pakistan [ISRCTN12421731]

Abstract: Background: Household decision-makers decide about service use based largely on the costs and perceived benefits of health interventions. Very often this leads to different decisions than those imagined by health planners, resulting in under-utilisation of public services like immunisation. In the case of Lasbela district in the south of Pakistan, only one in every ten children is immunised despite free immunisation offers by government health services.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CASCADA expanded model responds to recognised limitations of the KAP model (Bentler & Speckart, 1979 ; Baranowski, Cullen, Nicklas, Thompson & Baranowski, 2003 ). We have used the CASCADA model in a trial of an intervention to increase vaccination uptake in Pakistan (Andersson et al, 2005 , 2009 ) and in a cross-sectional study in southern Africa (Mitchell, Cockcroft, Lamothe, & Andersson, 2010 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CASCADA expanded model responds to recognised limitations of the KAP model (Bentler & Speckart, 1979 ; Baranowski, Cullen, Nicklas, Thompson & Baranowski, 2003 ). We have used the CASCADA model in a trial of an intervention to increase vaccination uptake in Pakistan (Andersson et al, 2005 , 2009 ) and in a cross-sectional study in southern Africa (Mitchell, Cockcroft, Lamothe, & Andersson, 2010 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Separate articles discuss the protocol [1], baseline findings [2], and the outcome of the trial [3]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model views all intermediate steps between conscious knowledge and action as likely to be relevant, but not necessarily linearly related; the relative importance of the different steps varies with context. We have used the CASCADA model in resource-poor settings to support analysis and interpretation in cross-sectional studies examining health-related behaviours [ 38 , 39 ], to guide design of interventions [ 40 42 ] and as a framework for qualitative and quantitative analysis of intervention effects [ 43 , 44 ]. Figure 1 illustrates the way in which, according to the CASCADA model, the home visits will work to improve maternal outcomes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%