Household food wastage in Britain

Abstract

I . The total food and drink available for human consumption in the United Kingdom would provide approximately 13 MJ (3100 kcal)/person per d, while the energy intake recommended for the population is approximately 9.6 MJ (2300 kcal)/person per d. A proportion of this substantial difference must be due to wastage in the home as well as in catering establishments and during the storage, distribution and processing of food.2. As part of a general investigation of this problem, a representative sample of 1000 British households was asked to collect all the potentiallyedible food wasted in their homes during I week, and to keep a record of the food, other than commercial pet food, which they gave to pets and wild birds. A total of 672 households co-operated fully, 338 in summer and 334 in winter. Each food sample received was weighed, and its energy content was determined calorimetrically. 3.Significantly more waste food was collected in summer than in winter, equivalent to 9.3 MJ (2220 kcal)/ household per week and 7-1 MJ (1700 kcal)/household per week respectively. In terms of energy, cereals, fat and meat wastage predominated, while in terms of weight, milk was more important and fat less so.4. Considerable quantities of otherwise edible food were also given to pets and birds, accounting on average for a further 2-4 MJ (570 kcal) and 3-0 MJ (710 kcal)/household per week in summer and winter respectively. The energy content of all food wasted in the home therefore averaged I 1.7 MJ (2790 kcal)/ household per week in summer and IO'I MJ (2410 kcal)/household per week in winter, equivalent to 06 MJ (150 kcal) and 0.5 MJ (130 kcal)/person per d respectively. This is less than one-quarter of the gap between food supplies and the amount of food thought to be eaten in the UK.5. Food wastage was significantly influenced by the composition of the family, with adults wasting more in absolute terms than children, and larger households wasting less per person than smaller households. However, with few exceptions, neither income nor geographical region significantly affected the total amount of food wasted in the home. 6.When assessed against the expected usage of food in the home, wastage accounted on average for 6.5 % of the energy intake in summer and 5.4 % in winter.There was sufficient food in the United Kingdom in 1976 to have provided 12.3 MJ (2940 kcal) to each person each day, and a further 0.7 MJ (160 kcal) was available from alcoholic drinks (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, 19786). These estimates relate to the edible portion of the food made available for human consumption from our farms and from imports, after allowance has been made for exports, non-food usage and any changes in year-end stocks. In contrast, the weighted average physiological requirement of the population for energy, calculated from the intakes recommended by the Department of Health and Social Security (1969) for different categories of people in the United Kingdom was only 9-6-9.8 MJ (2300-2350 kcal)/person per d, the value depen...

Family food purchases and home food consumption: comparison of nutrient contents

“…Since the amount of waste collected in the first two studies was similar to that reported by Dowler (1977) and Wenlock et al (1980), families in the random sample were not asked to collect waste, as it was felt that to do so might adversely affect the co-operation rate.…”

Addressing the problems of food waste generation in Malaysia

“…According to Wenlock and Buss (1980), this could either be due to culture or geographical location. Therefore, in these question, respondents from both Selangor and Terengganu where asked to indicate the composition of food waste they generates most frequent, frequently and less frequent as food waste in their individual households.…”

Food Waste Drivers in Europe, from Identification to Possible Interventions

“…Some distinctive characteristics of the urban households show significant correlations with the amount of FW individually produced. Households consisting of few members or one single person, of young members, of children, and relatively high income seem to be the features that are mostly related with higher FW production per capita [9,[13][14][15][16]22,30,55,104,[146][147][148][149][150][151]. Direct comparisons between urban and rural households indicate that the former are significantly higher FW producers [15,152].…”