2023
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16982-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Household hardships and responses to COVID-19 pandemic-related shocks in Eastern Ethiopia

Jonathan A. Muir,
Merga Dheresa,
Zachary J. Madewell
et al.

Abstract: Background COVID-19 resulted in enormous disruption to life around the world. To quell disease spread, governments implemented lockdowns that likely created hardships for households. To improve knowledge of consequences, we examine how the pandemic period was associated with household hardships and assess factors associated with these hardships. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study using quasi-Poisson regression to examine factors associate… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16] However, our findings are generally consistent with findings reported in other studies from sub-Saharan African countries. [40][41][42] As an observational study, other potential limitations include unmeasured variable bias (for example, we did not gather information related to food insecurity beyond increases in local food prices) or recall bias due to the extended length of time considered in the study (i.e., some respondents may have forgotten hardships that occurred closer to the onset of the pandemic). We also cannot draw causal inferences given the cross-sectional nature of the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[16] However, our findings are generally consistent with findings reported in other studies from sub-Saharan African countries. [40][41][42] As an observational study, other potential limitations include unmeasured variable bias (for example, we did not gather information related to food insecurity beyond increases in local food prices) or recall bias due to the extended length of time considered in the study (i.e., some respondents may have forgotten hardships that occurred closer to the onset of the pandemic). We also cannot draw causal inferences given the cross-sectional nature of the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is part of a broader examination within the Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) Network to analyze the consequences of COVID-19 lockdowns for child health and mortality. [40][41][42][43] Leveraging the established platform within the CHAMPS Network of HDSS [44] in 2021, we administered a questionnaire to households in Manhiça, Mozambique.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is part of a broader investigation within the Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) network to understand the implications of COVID-19 lockdowns for child health and mortality [ 34 , 43 – 45 ]. We developed and administered a short quantitative instrument designed to understand how the pandemic and related lockdowns may have affected livelihood, food availability, and healthcare.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is anticipated that COVID-19 has exacerbated this vulnerability [ 7 , 11 , 33 ]. Households hit with an economic shock such as a job loss or loss of income during the pandemic are likely at high risk for experiencing food insecurity, as they must reduce expenditures to adapt to the economic shock [ 9 , 34 ]. Disadvantaged groups such as women and children, people working in the informal sector or unemployed, those with limited financial resources, those with medical conditions, and those relying on emergency food aid are also at high risk [ 23 , 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%