2003
DOI: 10.1080/00220380412331293757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Household income dynamics: a four-country story

Abstract: Abstract[Excerpt] In this paper, we analyse the dynamics of household per capita incomes using longitudinal data from Indonesia, South Africa, Spain and Venezuela. We find that in all four countries reported initial income and job changes of the head are consistently the most important variables in accounting for income changes, overall and for initially poor households. We also find that changes in income are more important than changes in household size and that changes in labour earnings are more important … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
59
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality, we confirmed that all variables had a normal distribution. Following Fields (2003) and Fields et al (2003), we used a decomposition analysis to estimate the relative contribution of each determinant of livelihood outcomes. The inequality of the dependent variable was decomposed using so-called factor inequality weights, whereby the more positive the weight for a given explanatory variable, the more it contributed to the inequality of the dependent variable, while negative weights implied that the factor caused the dependent variable to be more equally distributed .…”
Section: Conceptual and Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality, we confirmed that all variables had a normal distribution. Following Fields (2003) and Fields et al (2003), we used a decomposition analysis to estimate the relative contribution of each determinant of livelihood outcomes. The inequality of the dependent variable was decomposed using so-called factor inequality weights, whereby the more positive the weight for a given explanatory variable, the more it contributed to the inequality of the dependent variable, while negative weights implied that the factor caused the dependent variable to be more equally distributed .…”
Section: Conceptual and Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For now, the key point to note is that in each paper the labour market plays a key role in determining household mobility patterns. For example, Fields et al (2003b) find that changes in the labour market status of the household head is the most important factor driving changes in real household incomes. Leibbrandt and Woolard (2001) find that the addition or loss of a job is the major factor moving a household out of or into poverty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of using panel data to study distributional change is that we are able to measure the extent to which those individuals who initially were at various points on the income ladder moved up or down during different macroeconomic conditions. As has been noted in our own previous work (Fields et al, 2003; as well as in a recent paper by Grimm (2007), the panel results and the cross-section results may convey quite different qualitative impressions from one another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The reason for the choice of change in earnings as the variable of interest rather than change in total income is that in a number of economies including South Africa, Indonesia, Spain, and Venezuela, earnings changes have been shown to constitute the single most important source of variation of change in total income, more so than all the other income sources combined (Fields et al, 2003).…”
Section: (C) Datamentioning
confidence: 99%