Household-Level Determinants of Participation in Forest Support Programmes in the Miombo Landscapes, Zambia

Abstract

The need to protect forest resources from unsustainable, yet rational, human actions has attracted global attention. This is because smallholder dependence on forests can degrade forest resources and cause deforestation. While efforts to understand forest programmes and motivations to protect forests have increased in recent decades, there remains a limited understanding of household factors affecting participation in forest support programmes, especially in the context of high-pressure areas, such as the Miombo woodlands. This study was conducted in the North-Western, Copperbelt and Eastern Province of Zambia. In each province, we selected landscapes consisting of protected and non-protected forest areas. We administered structured interviews to 1123 households and used logistic regression to estimate determinants of participation. We found that better education, landholding size, increased share of forest income, cash crops and non-farm income, and access to forests and markets have a negative impact on participation in forest support programmes. Being located in landscapes with protected areas was positively associated with participation. We suggest that, in order to increase participation, forest programmes should focus on households with low levels of education, limited livelihood opportunities, and poor access to markets. Besides, programmes should provide incentives, including support for farm inputs and at the same time encourage reforestation and agroforestry methods.

Agroforestry as a Small Landholder’s Tool for Climate Change Resilience and Mitigation in Zimbabwe

“…Issues that relate to the factors that influence people's involvement in forest management programs need to be studied to determine the appropriate interventions [30]. Rural-based households in Zimbabwe encounter many hurdles to come out with relevant and applicable ways to cope with climate change impacts [8].…”

“…The challenge of deforestation has been exacerbated by the lack of corresponding efforts in reforestation. So, even though vegetation is a renewable natural resource, the rate at which regeneration of trees and other components of the ecosystem that survive after the damage is lower than the rate of the loss is incurred [30]. Massive biodiversity loss follows.…”

“…In the same vein, the practice of agroforestry is an attempt to restore natural ecosystems while increasing agricultural productivity that raises outputs for the benefit of human beings. This is borne out of the understanding that the livelihoods of vulnerable people are anchored on natural resources including forests [30].…”

Estimation of the Aboveground Carbon Stock in Kanonge Local Forest of Kaputa District in Northern Province, Zambia

“…Forest products are a source of income for rural areas, as evidenced by the fact that rural people continue to rely on them for income. Kazungu et al, (2021) contended that, tropical and subtropical forest landscapes support the livelihoods of their inhabitants through subsistence use of goods and financial gain through product sales. Forest products provide for an average of 20.6 percent of total household income (subsistence and cash) at the eight sites studied, and are the second or first source of income in five of them.…”

Rural Households’ Perceptions of Rosehip and the Role It Plays in Rural Livelihoods in Lesotho

“…According to Suleiman et al (2017), large families have limited land holdings and high food dependency ratios, so they rely on natural resource collection due to the availability of family labour. Older household heads are more likely to participate in natural resource collection because it improves their livelihood opportunities (Kazungu et al, 2021). Studies also found that membership in forest products-related groups or any social network is critical for exchanging information between members and even the pursuit of a common goal (Suleiman et…”