2019
DOI: 10.1257/aeri.20180444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Household Matters: Revisiting the Returns to Capital among Female Microentrepreneurs

Abstract: Multiple field experiments report positive financial returns to capital shocks for male and not female microentrepreneurs. But these analyses overlook the fact that female entrepreneurs often reside with male entrepreneurs. Using data from experiments in India, Sri Lanka, and Ghana, we show that the observed gender gap in microenterprise responses does not reflect lower returns on investment, when measured at the household level. Instead, the absence of a profit response among female-run enterprises reflects t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Bernhardt et al (2017) offer an explanation for this by showing that grants to female owners can lead to increased business income for other household members.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Bernhardt et al (2017) offer an explanation for this by showing that grants to female owners can lead to increased business income for other household members.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jakiela and Ozier (2016) find that women are willing to pay to hide investment returns from relatives. Meanwhile, Bernhardt, Field, Pande, and Rigol (2019) re-examine data on differences in returns to microenterprise investment between men and women and find the lower returns for women documented by de Mel, McKenzie, and Woodruff (2008) and Fafchamps, McKenzie, Quinn, and Woodruff (2014) are entirely explained by the presence of a male-owned enterprise in the household (which presumably receives the bulk of the investment).…”
Section: Who Within and Across Households Migrates?mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Economists originally explained this gender differential in investment by citing timeinconsistent preferences-the difficulty that people face in prioritizing future gains over current consumption-and pressures to share cash with others in the household or social network (Fafchamps et al, 2014). But, Bernhardt, Field, Pande, and Rigol (2017) recently reanalyzed data from the Ghana experiment as well as two others that attempted to relieve capital constraints faced by microentrepreneurs. The original studies had all documented gender gaps in investment behaviors (De Mel et al, 2008;Field et al, 2013;Fafchamps et al, 2014).…”
Section: Women Entrepreneursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reanalysis finds that when women are the sole enterprise owner within the household, capital shocks do lead to increased profits. However, when their husbands also own enterprises, women's capital is invested into their husband's business rather than their own (Bernhardt et al, 2017). Relatedly, in a study in Sri Lanka, De Mel et al (2008) determine that women's decision-making power and level of cooperation with their spouse affects their business investment behavior.…”
Section: Women Entrepreneursmentioning
confidence: 99%