2000
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.234154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Household Portfolios in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
150
0
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
14
150
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Heaton and Lucas (2000) used OLS estimation after eliminating those sample individuals whose asset holdings fell below a certain level. On the other hand, Bertaut and Starr-McCluer (2000) used Heckman's selectivity bias correction to account for the fact that many of the portfolio shares are zeros. This study followed Poterba and Samwick (1997) and used a Tobit estimator.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Heaton and Lucas (2000) used OLS estimation after eliminating those sample individuals whose asset holdings fell below a certain level. On the other hand, Bertaut and Starr-McCluer (2000) used Heckman's selectivity bias correction to account for the fact that many of the portfolio shares are zeros. This study followed Poterba and Samwick (1997) and used a Tobit estimator.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stockholding puzzle has been widely documented using data from different countries [e.g., Bertaut and Starr-McCluer (2000) analyses the US, Alessie et al (2000) the Netherlands and Guiso and Jappelli (2000) uses data from Italy] and alternative explanations to it have been proposed such as the combination of high cost of borrowing and uncertain labor earnings (Davis et al 2006) or the heterogeneity in expectations (Vissing-Jorgensen 2003). 3 The role of entry costs has been documented for the US by Vissing-Jorgensen (2000) using data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics.…”
Section: Ampudia Fraile (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the household receives the interest payment and does not pay any cancellation fee. 6 Contrary to previous literature, we do not restrict our model to just liquid or illiquid assets, because in each of the three subgroups we consider, the assets present di¤erent characteristics, returns, and volatilities. We thus assume that the market for mortgages and deposits, assuming the household does not pay the deposit cancellation fee, operates with a lag with respect to the liquid assets.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%