Housing and Quality of Life for Migrant Communities in Western Europe: A Capabilities Approach

Abstract

Executive SummaryHousing is an important determinant of quality of life and migrants are more likely to encounter poor quality housing than natives. This paper draws on the capabilities approach to welfare economics to examine how issues of housing and neighborhood conditions influence quality of life and opportunities for migrants in Western Europe. The analysis utilizes data from the second European Quality of Life Survey (EQLS) to explore variation in life and housing satisfaction between migrants and nonmigrants (natives) in Western Europe and whether being a migrant and living in an ethnically diverse neighborhood contribute to lower satisfaction. The results show that migrants are more likely to experience lower levels of life and housing satisfaction and that living in a diverse neighborhood is negatively associated with life and housing satisfaction. While diverse, inner-city neighborhoods can increase opportunities for labor market access, social services and integration, the tendency towards clustered settlement by migrants can also compound housing inequality. Conversely, migrant homeowners are on average substantially more satisfied with the quality of public services and of their neighborhood and have lower material deprivation than both migrant and non-migrant renters. The findings draw attention to the need to address housing and neighborhood conditions in order to improve opportunities for integration and well-being. Journal on Migration and Human Security 164

Identifying the changes in the quality of life of Southern African Development Community (SADC) migrants in South Africa from 2001 to 2011

“…The need for better livelihoods is a top goal for everyone which implies that, access to different resources and services is important in attaining a better quality of life (QOL) (Coates et al 2013;Mahadea 2014). People often measure their well-being by looking at their immediate environment, families and livelihoods, before looking at the wider environment.…”

The greener, the happier? The effects of greenspace on residents' happiness in contemporary urban China

“…Extensive studies have shown that greenspace coverage is often associated with economic development which is widely shown to be correlated with happiness as a whole (i.e., Guo & Hu, 2011; Hagerty & Veenhoven, 2003; Stevenson & Wolfers, 2008). Similar to economic development, the correlation between greenspace coverage and housing price has been widely documented (i.e., Chen et al 2020; Noor et al, 2015; J. Wu et al, 2015), and housing price is also shown to be an important factor that is closely related to regional living costs, exerting important impact one's happiness level (i.e., Cheng et al, 2020; Coates et al, 2015; Florida et al 2013). To remove the potential confounding coming from economic development and housing price, the relevant variable should be properly controlled.…”

Housing justice as expansion of people’s capabilities for housing

“…For the cases below the minimum standards, such as with insufficient space, inadequate heating, and lack of basic amenities, the results have repeatedly shown an unambiguous relationship between a low level of housing satisfaction and poor dwelling conditions (e.g. Diaz-Serrano 2006;Balestra and Sultan 2013;Coates, Anand and Norris 2015). These observations raise doubts whether the problem of adaptive preference and the inconsistency between housing satisfaction and the human right to living in adequate housing would be significant; it may be marginal in reality, unlike in Sen's critical argument.…”