2018
DOI: 10.1080/10530789.2018.1442186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Housing interventions for homeless, pregnant/parenting women with addictions: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supportive housing has been described as effective in reducing homelessness and achieving housing stability for people with moderate and high support needs when compared to usual care [ 30 ]. The Housing First program had shown promising health, employment, housing, and social outcomes in homeless pregnant/parenting women using substances [ 31 ]. However, due to low standardization in outcome measure domains and tools, further research is needed to correctly assess the long-term effects of housing interventions on physical and mental health, as well as on quality of life [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Supportive housing has been described as effective in reducing homelessness and achieving housing stability for people with moderate and high support needs when compared to usual care [ 30 ]. The Housing First program had shown promising health, employment, housing, and social outcomes in homeless pregnant/parenting women using substances [ 31 ]. However, due to low standardization in outcome measure domains and tools, further research is needed to correctly assess the long-term effects of housing interventions on physical and mental health, as well as on quality of life [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Housing First program had shown promising health, employment, housing, and social outcomes in homeless pregnant/parenting women using substances [ 31 ]. However, due to low standardization in outcome measure domains and tools, further research is needed to correctly assess the long-term effects of housing interventions on physical and mental health, as well as on quality of life [ 30 , 31 ]. On the other hand, income assistance interventions, such as housing subsidies, have been described as capable of improving housing stability, independent housing, quality of life and food security [ 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…115 A 2018 systematic review demonstrated the benefits of case manage ment paired with Housing First services in address ing the multifaceted needs of pregnant and early parenting women who are experiencing homeless ness and addiction concerns. 116 that women were more accepting of a referral to home visitation compared to specialized services following brief interventions. 104 Different delivery settings and modalities of brief interventions were also described, demonstrat ing new trends in implementation.…”
Section: Case Managementmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For our purpose, the above discussion shows that existing methods of reviewing can now better accommodate the theoretical, methodological and epistemological diversity of housing studies (Wallace et al, 2006). Systematic reviewing in housing studies adopted realist positions in relation to homelessness (Krahn, Caine, Chaw-Kant, & Singh, 2018;O'Campo et al, 2009;Woodhall-Melnik & Dunn, 2016) and environmental issues (Daly, 2017); and moderate idealist approaches in relation to energy use and habitability (McCabe, Pojani, & van Groenou, 2018;Willis, Phillips, Ryan, Bursac, & Ferguson, 2017), gentrification and gated communities (Atkinson, 2004;Blandy et al, 2003), empty homes (Wallace et al, 2005), mortgage markets (Croucher et al, 2003) and older people's decisions on residential mobility (Roy, Dub e, Despr es, Freitas, & L egar e, 2018).…”
Section: What Is Systematic Literature Mapping?mentioning
confidence: 99%