“…However, as, under neoliberalism, the state transformed its goals to facilitate the role of real estate development and oriented urban policy to ensure the profitability of urban development businesses, both types of urban practitioners are chasing the same goals: economic efficiency and profit. This is the case in Chile, where, since 1979, the state has embraced the idea of leaving the role of shaping urban spaces to the market, dismantling urban planning, and working through a subsidiary scheme in which the provider of urban products is always a private agent for urban development (Cociña 2016; Daher 1990; Donoso and Sabatini 1980; Hidalgo Dattwyler, Bilbao, and Rivas 2016; López-Morales 2009; Smart and Burgos 2018; Vergara-Perucich and Aguirre-Nuñez 2019).…”