2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00193.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hovenkamp's ostracized vicariance analysis: testing new methods of historical biogeography

Abstract: All methods currently employed in cladistic biogeography usually give contrasting results and are theoretically disputed. In two overlooked papers, Hovenkamp (1997Hovenkamp ( , 2001 strongly criticized methods currently used by biogeographers and proposed two other methods. However, his criticisms have remained unanswered and his methods rarely applied.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protocol aims to reconstruct the history of a geographic area through a sequence of vicariance events inferred from the allopatric distributions of sister taxa. This allows for reticulate and divergent patterns without assuming hierarchical relationship of areas, avoiding unrealistic assumptions prevalent in traditional cladistic biogeographical methods (56). The focus of the protocol is on detecting barriers that separate biotas, not on the relationship between predefined areas of endemism, and it is therefore suited for disentangling the origins of current distributional patterns of taxa (57) and the boundaries of our bioregions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protocol aims to reconstruct the history of a geographic area through a sequence of vicariance events inferred from the allopatric distributions of sister taxa. This allows for reticulate and divergent patterns without assuming hierarchical relationship of areas, avoiding unrealistic assumptions prevalent in traditional cladistic biogeographical methods (56). The focus of the protocol is on detecting barriers that separate biotas, not on the relationship between predefined areas of endemism, and it is therefore suited for disentangling the origins of current distributional patterns of taxa (57) and the boundaries of our bioregions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Areas of endemism are seen by many (Dos as the basic units in historical biogeography. Even if one agrees with recent viewpoints (Hovenkamp 1997(Hovenkamp , 2001Fattorini 2007) that vicariance analysis does not require prior recognition of areas of endemism, the notion of endemism is so pervasive in biology and biogeography that determining what these areas are and whether they exist at all is important in its own right.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…a geological event or barrier which appeared and physically separated populations) is not necessarily implied by a disjunct distribution; a successful dispersal over a pre‐existing barrier resulting in speciation (as in the colonization of an oceanic island) will also produce a disjunct distribution. Therefore, focusing on disjunct distributions does not imply that vicariance is the only process allowed by the analysis (Fattorini, 2008); rather, it recognizes that a disjunct distribution implies the existence of an effective barrier to dispersal (Hovenkamp, 1997, 2001).…”
Section: The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%