First off, the term t ∆ is for the smallest unit of time step. Now, due to reasons we will discuss we state that, contrary to the wishes of a reviewer, the author asserts that a full Galois theory analysis of a quintic is mandatory for reasons which reflect about how the physics answers are all radically different for abbreviated lower math tech answers to this problem. i.e. if one turns the 1 2 ⋅ Is Generally, in the Galois Sense Solvable for a Kerr-Newman Black Hole Affect Questions on the Opening and Closing of a Wormhole Throat and the Simplification of the Problem, Dramatically Speaking, If d = 1 (Kaluza Klein Theory) and Explaining the Lack of Overlap with the Results When Applying the Gauss-Lucas Theorem. Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, 5, 235-278.We assert that due to the fact that abbreviated lower math tech approximations to the derived quintic yield incommensurate very different physics answers to the delta t, t ∆ , problem, hence due to those very different answers, it is necessary to stop convenient approximations and to solve the problem via Galois theory. The godfather review of all solvable quintic problems is given here [1] and although a reviewer refused to learn the points raised, a solution to this specialized quintic is given in [2]. Whereas it will be the job of explaining in simple language why this is necessary. What we found is that if one changed the Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology quintic to a quadratic, that the answers for the t ∆ problem look radically different from what we get when we take the derivative of the quintic, changing it, to understanding that golly gee, the following are not commensurate with each other. Note that the 2 nd entry into Equation (1) below comes from applying the Gauss-Lucas theorem [3] [4]. In the end the three different would be general solutions to t ∆ in these three equations look very different from each other. This is using manipulations of the original quintic as given by the author in [5] higher dimensions, i.e. 1 d ≠ gets very complicated fast hence this long article. And also, we will be dealing with the reviewers [14] distaste for negative temperature, which is what started this inquiry in the first place due to comments raised by the reviewer in [14] is related to Kaluza Klein cosmology as given in reference [15] where we have an explanation as with respect to reference [16] and negative temperatures. As is noted in reference [16], negative temperatures when connected with the solution to the quintic as in [2] and [5] do, in certain cases which will be outlined connect solidly with negative temperatures. Contributing to positive entropy in black holes, this is relatable to the physics in [17] [18] which will be in our article. [2] due to the range of values of 1 A and 2 A in [5]. This in turns of the additional dimensionality, d, for space times above four dimensions specifies temp T . [5]. When d = 1 we have Kaluza Klein type physics, and so it goes. The Kaluza Klein [15] situation with d = 1...
