2020
DOI: 10.31236/osf.io/7qh4c
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘How’ a multidisciplinary team worked effectively to reduce injury in a professional sport environment - Pre-Print

Abstract: In professional team sport, managing injury risk depends on the effective collaboration of technical/tactical coaches, strength and conditioning coaches, sports medicine practitioners and sport scientists within a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Yet, to date no research has examined how these professionals might co-ordinate their efforts. The aim of this study is to examine the processes and interactions utilized by a demonstrably effective MDT. The efficacy of the MDT was established by quantifying the injury b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, perceived importance could be related to other coaches' practices within a multi-disciplinary team. For example, research involving a sports-based multi-disciplinary team suggests that operational monitoring (i.e., monitoring day to day processes), and reflections of observations could influence decision-making related to injury prevention (Tee & Rongen, 2020). Specifically, these observations may change the focus of subsequent training sessions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, perceived importance could be related to other coaches' practices within a multi-disciplinary team. For example, research involving a sports-based multi-disciplinary team suggests that operational monitoring (i.e., monitoring day to day processes), and reflections of observations could influence decision-making related to injury prevention (Tee & Rongen, 2020). Specifically, these observations may change the focus of subsequent training sessions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst confidence was not directly measured, it indicates that some teams may not have been wholly satisfied that the first aider knew about the game and common injuries in BAF. Research suggests that effective teams work in a multidisciplinary manner, using open communication and having clearly defined roles [47]. Teams without a clear and consistent medical provision plan cannot hope to manage player welfare and are unlikely able to build an effective performance environment [39,48,49].…”
Section: Policies/procedures and Documentationsmentioning
confidence: 99%