How accounting academicians can use citation indexing and analysis for research

Gamble, George O.; O'Doherty, Brian

doi:10.1016/0748-5751(85)90012-0

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Discussion1

Citation Analysis1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1997

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 12 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In accounting, document co-citation analysis has been used to reveal the structure of individual research areas (Gamble and O'Doherty (1985) examine income smoothing and Gamble et al (1987) examine agency theory).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Theoretical studies of the historical development of the accounting discipline: A review and evidence

Beattie

Davie

2006

Accounting, Business & Financial History

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Theoretical studies of the historical development of the accounting discipline: A review and evidence

Beattie

Davie

2006

Accounting, Business & Financial History

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Beattie & Ryan, 1991;Bricker, 1988;Gamble & O'Doherty, 1985a,b, McRae 1974 were limited in scope by the diculty of developing a database. For instance, McRae ®rst used citation analysis of only 17 accounting publications to measure the frequency of citations.…”

Section: Citation Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Benchmarks for evaluating the research productivity of accounting faculty

Hasselback

Reinstein

Schwan

2000

Journal of Accounting Education

100

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study reports comprehensive data on both the quantity and quality of research productivity of 3878 accounting faculty who earned their accounting doctoral degrees from 1971 to 1993. Publications in 40 journals were used to measure faculty publication quantity. Journal ratings derived from a compilation of the rankings of ®ve prior studies and co-authorship were used to measure publication quality. Choosing benchmarks for an individual faculty requires users of our data to determine four parameters: (1) what credit to give a faculty member for co-authored articles; (2) what level of journal quality is appropriate, e.g. presenting benchmarks for publications in the Best 4, Best 12, Best 22 and Best 40 journals; (3) choosing appropriate levels of performance, e.g. considering the publication record in the top 10%, top 20%, top 25%, top 33%, or top 50% of all faculty; and (4) deciding the emphasis to place on the number of years since the doctoral degree was earned. We believe that this is the ®rst set of benchmarks that allows administrators to state, with some justi®cation, a required number of articles for tenure or promotion. In addition, we discovered that the average number of authors per article is signi®cantly correlated with time and growing at a pace of 0.017 authors per article per year. #

show abstract

Assessing the State of the IR Research Field: A Structured Literature Review

Izzo

2024

SIDREA Series in Accounting and Business Administration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How accounting academicians can use citation indexing and analysis for research

Cited by 12 publications

References 57 publications

Theoretical studies of the historical development of the accounting discipline: A review and evidence

Theoretical studies of the historical development of the accounting discipline: A review and evidence

Benchmarks for evaluating the research productivity of accounting faculty

Assessing the State of the IR Research Field: A Structured Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About