2016
DOI: 10.5194/tc-2016-250
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How accurate are estimates of glacier ice thickness? Results from ITMIX, the Ice Thickness Models Intercomparison eXperiment

Abstract: Abstract. Knowledge of the ice thickness distribution of glaciers and ice caps is an important prerequisite for many glaciological and hydrological investigations. A wealth of approaches has recently been presented for inferring ice thickness from characteristics of the surface. With the Ice Thickness Models Intercomparison eXperiment (ITMIX) we performed the first coordinated assessment quantifying individual model performance. A set of 17 different models showed that individual ice thickness estimates can di… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model applies a constant shear stress approximation following [29] and calculates ice depth from surface slope taking into account effects of elevation range on mass turn-over and interpolating between constructed branch lines for individual glaciers. Within the general uncertainty range of distributed ice-thickness estimates, the predictive quality of the approach is equal to more complex methods [30]. Major advantages of GlabTop are its simplicity, transparency, robustness (no tuning necessary), easily accessible input information, and rapid calculation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model applies a constant shear stress approximation following [29] and calculates ice depth from surface slope taking into account effects of elevation range on mass turn-over and interpolating between constructed branch lines for individual glaciers. Within the general uncertainty range of distributed ice-thickness estimates, the predictive quality of the approach is equal to more complex methods [30]. Major advantages of GlabTop are its simplicity, transparency, robustness (no tuning necessary), easily accessible input information, and rapid calculation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This normally comprises the glacier outline and the surface topography. In the "Ice Thickness Models Intercomparison eXperiment" (ITMIX; Farinotti et al, 2016), two types of reconstruction approaches rely exclusively on this geometric information. The first type stems from a perfect plasticity assumption, relating ice thicknesses to a glacier-specific yields stress, which itself is inferred from the elevation range of the glacier (Linsbauer et al, 2012;Frey et al, 2014;Carrivick et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are process based [58] and are independent from uncertain precipitation records. Their spatial resolution is higher than that of large-scale satellite approaches, and the combination of both seems beneficial.…”
Section: Glacier Evolution and Runoff Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both studies make use of remote sensing approaches in absence of a ground-based glacier monitoring. Here, we compare those satellite-based approaches to the GlabTop-based results, because glacier thickness modeling can have substantial uncertainties [58].…”
Section: Volumetric Glacier Changementioning
confidence: 99%