2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How accurate are parental chronic pain histories provided by offspring?

Abstract: Previous work suggests possible relationships between offspring-reported parental history of chronic pain (CP) and offsprings' personal chronic pain experience. This study examined reliability of offsprings' reports of parental CP history based on direct comparison with confirmed parental reports. Participants included 108 male and female college students who completed a questionnaire assessing presence/absence and locations of any past or present CP lasting greater than 3 months. Information on maternal and p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, one may speculate that the occurrence of CMP in the adult offspring is strongly influenced by genetic factors. Conversely, it has been suggested that children of parents who display pain behavior adopt similar behaviors and are also more likely to report pain than their peers [32, 33]. However, our data did not allow us to decide the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors to CMP.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, one may speculate that the occurrence of CMP in the adult offspring is strongly influenced by genetic factors. Conversely, it has been suggested that children of parents who display pain behavior adopt similar behaviors and are also more likely to report pain than their peers [32, 33]. However, our data did not allow us to decide the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors to CMP.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…It is well established that independent pain reports from parents and offspring are necessary to achieve acceptable validity in family-linkage studies [32]. We are only aware of two previous studies that have investigated parent-offspring associations within the same study population using independent pain reports from parents and offspring [14, 15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Persistent Pain Questionnaire (PPQ) was used to assess history and location of non-abdominal chronic pain (32). Participants were asked to identify locations of both current and lifetime chronic pain based on standard body locations described by the International Association for the Study of Pain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, 41% of FAP participants and 11% of healthy participants reported experiencing daily or near daily pain in the 3 months prior to the study procedures. This latter finding is not surprising given results of studies regarding the relatively common occurrence of persistent pain in the general population [e.g., 5,6,18]. Although ongoing chronic pain at the time of the study would not seriously confound general conclusions regarding the effects of chronic pain on BP-related hypoalgesia, it would potentially influence conclusions regarding whether such changes persist once FAP is resolved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Of the 95 patients recruited for the FAP group, one had since been diagnosed with Crohn’s disease (an organic abdominal pain condition) and was excluded from the final sample. Based on information provided by all participants on the Persistent Pain Questionnaire (modified to assess persistent pain in the past 3 months)[18], 41% of the FAP group and 11% of the Healthy group were experiencing daily or near daily pain in at least one body location for the 3 months prior to this study. Mean overall clinical pain intensity in the past month rated on a 0–5 scale (anchored with “none” and “very severe”) was in the “mild” range for both groups, but was significantly higher in FAP group participants than in Healthy participants (see Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%