How Accurately Can Emergency Department Providers Estimate Patient Satisfaction

Abstract

IntroductionPatient satisfaction is an important measure of emergency department (ED) quality of care. Little is known about providers' ability to estimate patient satisfaction. We aimed to measure providers' ability to assess patient satisfaction and hypothesized that providers could accurately estimate overall patient satisfaction.MethodsWe surveyed ED patients regarding satisfaction with their care. Treating providers completed analogous surveys, estimating patients' responses. Sexual assault victims and non-English-speaking or severely ill patients were excluded. Satisfaction responses were categorized as “satisfied” or “not satisfied.” Patient satisfaction scores were considered the “gold standard,” and providers' perceptions of the patient satisfaction were considered tests. Measures of diagnostic accuracy, such as positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity, were used to assess how accurately the provider could estimate his or her patient's satisfaction.ResultsHere, 242/457 eligible patients (53%) completed the survey; 227 providers (94%) completed a corresponding survey. Subject-reported overall satisfaction was 96.6%, compared with a provider-estimated rate of 94.4%. The sensitivity and PPV of the provider's estimate of the patient's satisfaction were 95.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 91.4, 97.7) and 97.5 (95% CI 94.4, 99.2), respectively, for overall patient satisfaction. The PPV was similar for clarity of communication. The PPV was 78.9 for perceived length of ED stay (99% CI 70.8, 85.6) and 82.6 for quality of pain control (95% CI 68.6, 92.3). Accuracy of attending and resident estimates of patient satisfaction did not differ significantly. The agreement between patient-reported and provider-estimated patient satisfaction was not associated with age, gender, patient disposition, or ED divert status.ConclusionProviders are able to assess overall patient satisfaction and clarity of communication with a high accuracy. Physician estimates of pain control and perceived length of stay have a moderate accuracy.

Can machine learning techniques predict customer dissatisfaction? A feasibility study for the automotive industry

“…There is a significant cross-industrial need to identify dissatisfied customers, since companies are no longer competing only on product quality but even more on a service quality level. [46][47][48] This work showed a method to classify dissatisfied customers from the automotive industry based on data produced within a service process with a maximum classification rate of 88.8%. Generally, the approach is designed to secure the practical implication by considering high accuracy and fast computing power as necessary success factors.…”

Translating satisfaction determination from health care to the automotive industry

“…The relationship between customer satisfaction and expectations is known as the confirmation/disconfirmation paradigm (Anderson 1973;Anderson and Sullivan 1993;Churchill and Surprenant 1982;Oliver 1980). The importance of capturing the perceived performance is consequently highly relevant to measure satisfaction (Cheng and Yang 2013;Johnson and Fornell 1991) and is uncontroversial across different services and industries (Herrmann et al 2000;Homburg and Rudolph 2001;Huang and Dubinsky 2013;Rao et al 2006;Rhee and Bird 1996;Trout et al 2000;Yarris et al 2012). Companies define a detailed understanding of customer needs as an essential factor in their competitive strategies (Anderson and Sullivan 1993;Herrmann et al 2000).…”

“…The measurement and interpretation of perceived consumer satisfaction has long been an important field of research in the service industries (Anderson and Sullivan 1993;Herrmann et al 2000;Homburg and Rudolph 2001;Huang and Dubinsky 2013;Mittal and Lassar 1998;Yarris et al 2012). Perceived customer satisfaction expresses how well the services provided by companies meet customer needs (Anderson and Sullivan 1993).…”

Slow or swift, your patients’ experience won’t drift: absence of correlation between physician productivity and the patient experience

“…For many years, EDs have been struggling with crowding and access block; recently this problem has become particularly dire. [1][2][3][4][5][6] Increased physician productivity (patients seen per hour), may enhance ED operational efficiency if associated with reduced patient wait times, and is financially rewarding to physicians working within volume-incentivised compensation models such as fee-for-service. 7 However, rapid care may limit the duration and quality of physician-patient interactions, which are primary determinants of the patient experience.…”