How aesthetic features convey the concept of brand premiumness

Abstract

When do aesthetic properties convey the concept of premiumness? Is symmetry tied to the perception of premiumness due to symmetry's evolutionary association to quality, an association not present with other aesthetic features like curvature? Usually, symmetry and curvature are preferred features. However, preference itself may not suffice to evoke premiumness. With this in mind, we predicted that symmetry (vs. asymmetry) and high(vs. low) product quality would both increase the perception of premiumness of a product while curvature (curved vs. angular) would only do so when it aligned with product quality. We conducted two preliminary exploratory experiments and four preregistered experiments in which we manipulated product quality, symmetry, and curvature of product packaging and measured preference and premiumness perception. We also conducted four additional experiments using a different product category to assess the generalizability of our results. We found that while both symmetry and curvature affect preference, only symmetry affects premiumness perception. Importantly, our results indicate that the extent to which aesthetic features convey brand premiumness can be product‐specific. We suggest a theoretical model on when visual aesthetic properties convey premiumness. Overall, our study informs how subtle aesthetic elements play a role in value perception, something which firms can capitalize on.

Impact of self‐brand connection on willingness to pay premium: Relevant mediators and moderators

“…Past studies provide evidence of how CC impacts consumers': (1) brand responses (Hernandez et al, 2019) and (2) price judgements (Berdysheva & Romanova, 2017). As a result, premium brand marketers (Pombo & Velasco, 2021) must understand how to mitigate the negative impact of CC on BL and WPP, and our research makes an endeavor to contribute to this aspect.…”

“Looking sharp”: Price typeface influences awareness of spending in mobile payment

“…While round typefaces are conventionally perceived to be soft and feminine, angular typefaces are perceived to be hard and masculine (Grohmann, 2016; Wang et al, 2020). In addition, round (vs. angular) typefaces generally induce feelings of pleasantness and friendliness (Henderson et al, 2004; Pombo & Velasco, 2021). Furthermore, a separate line of crossmodal research has shown that round typefaces tend to be associated with a sweet taste, whereas angular typefaces tend to be matched with bitter, sour, and salty tastes instead (Velasco et al, 2014; Velasco, Hyndman, et al, 2018; Velasco & Spence, 2019).…”

Key Factors that Influence Consumer Preferences for Natural‐Hyped Products

“…The results show that perceived naturalness is linked to (1) the way food has been grown, ( 2) what ingredients and technologies have been used to manufacture a product, and (3) the product properties (e.g., freshness, flavor, accordance with nature, and healthiness). What is relevant to our theoretical framework is that these dimensions are the ones that influence consumer preferences and product perception (Pombo & Velasco, 2021;Shao & Li, 2021;Zhou et al, 2021). Rozin (2005) and Rozin et al (2004) suggest that perceived naturalness can be elicited via two marketing techniques.…”