2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.18.537193
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How AlphaFold shaped the structural coverage of the human transmembrane proteome

Abstract: AlphaFold2 (AF2) provides structures for every protein, opening up prospects for virtually every field in structural biology. However, transmembrane proteins pose a challenge for experimental scientists, resulting in a limited number of solved structures. Consequently, algorithms trained on this finite training set also face difficulties. To address this issue, we recently launched the TmAlphaFold database, where predicted AlphaFold2 structures are embedded into the membrane plane and a quality assessment is p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we assumed that low results of proteins with MemMoRF may have arisen from the AlphaFold's capabilities for predicting their structures, since they involve several single-pass, bitopic transmembrane proteins. We also indirectly investigated this possibility, and used a transmembrane protein set with failed AlphaFold predictions (33), which group of proteins (low-AF, Table 1) resulted also very low MCC scores. Interestingly, excluding residues with a pLDDT score lower than 50 increased the TPR, F1, and MCC scores.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we assumed that low results of proteins with MemMoRF may have arisen from the AlphaFold's capabilities for predicting their structures, since they involve several single-pass, bitopic transmembrane proteins. We also indirectly investigated this possibility, and used a transmembrane protein set with failed AlphaFold predictions (33), which group of proteins (low-AF, Table 1) resulted also very low MCC scores. Interestingly, excluding residues with a pLDDT score lower than 50 increased the TPR, F1, and MCC scores.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of their reliance on the construction of MSAs, profile-based methods can have high computational overhead for database construction, query preparation, or both. Protein structure searches also show higher sensitivity than sequence searches (Jambrich et al, 2023 ). Until recently, the utility of structure searches for protein annotation was limited by the lack of extensive reference databases and the inability to predict structures quickly and reliably for sequences lacking experimentally determined structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%