2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00305.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How and when health‐care practitioners in Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services deliver alcohol screening and brief intervention, and why they don't: A qualitative study

Abstract: Introduction. Indigenous Australians experience a disproportionately high burden of alcohol-related harm. Alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) offers the potential to reduce this harm if barriers to its delivery in Aboriginal Community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• SEWB (nine studies) 19,20,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] • Alcohol misuse (five studies) 21,22,[35][36][37][38] • Smoking cessation (four studies) 23,24,[39][40][41] • Dual diagnosis -SEWB and drug or alcohol misuse (three studies) 17,18,42,43 • Depression 44,45 , depression or anxiety 46 , or a mental health worker program (four studies). 15,16 Nineteen studies were conducted in AMSs , six of which used mixed methods [17][18][19][20]30,31,37 and one of which was a quasiexperimental design.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…• SEWB (nine studies) 19,20,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] • Alcohol misuse (five studies) 21,22,[35][36][37][38] • Smoking cessation (four studies) 23,24,[39][40][41] • Dual diagnosis -SEWB and drug or alcohol misuse (three studies) 17,18,42,43 • Depression 44,45 , depression or anxiety 46 , or a mental health worker program (four studies). 15,16 Nineteen studies were conducted in AMSs , six of which used mixed methods [17][18][19][20]30,31,37 and one of which was a quasiexperimental design.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 12 studies, the risk of bias was judged to be high 19,20,27,28,30,[33][34][35]37,46 or unclear 21,22,36,40,45 , four were at moderate risk of bias 19,20,25,26,41,42,44 and five were at a low risk of bias. 23,24,29,31,39,43 AIMhi 1 was assessed using the qualitative 19 and randomised controlled trial 20 risk-of-bias tools, because these methods were reported separately.…”
Section: -183238mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations