How and where to map supply and demand of ecosystem services for policy-relevant outcomes?

Schröter, Matthias; Remme, Roy P.; Hein, Lars

doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.025

Cited by 60 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We agree with Schröter et al (2012) by considering that made "an important contribution to the development of mapping supply and demand of ES".…”

Section: Flexibilitysupporting

confidence: 76%

“…There have been very few attempts to quantitatively assess regulating services and cultural services due to the fact that available data are scarce and relevant indicator quite complex (European Commission 2014in Schröter et al 2012. However, the matrix approach can quickly provide estimates for all types of ES.…”

Section: Integrativementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, other concepts can be added to the ES assessed as ecological integrity indicators (e.g. Schröter et al 2012, Islam Sohel et al 2015 including the notion of biodiversity and the concept of ecosystem disservices, as recommended by Stoll et al (2015) and employed in our example application and analysis in Campagne et al 2018.…”

Section: Flexibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

May the matrix be with you! Guidelines for the application of expert-based matrix approach for ecosystem services assessment and mapping

Campagne¹,

Roche²

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Matrices or look-up tables are increasingly popular flexible tools for ecosystem services mapping and assessment. The matrix approach links ecosystem types or land cover types to ecosystem services by providing a score for ecosystem service (ES) capacity, supply, use, demand or other concepts. Using expert elicitation enables quick and integrative ES scoring that can meet general demand for validated ES mapping and assessment at different scales. Nevertheless, guidance is needed on how to collect and integrate expert knowledge to address some of the biases and limits of the expert elicitation method. This paper aims to propose a set of guidelines to produce ES matrices based on expert knowledge. It builds on existing literature and experience acquired through the production of several ES matrices in several ES assessments carried out in France. We propose a 7-steps methodology for the expert-based matrix approach that aims to promote cogency in the method and coherency in the matrices produced. The aim here is to use collective knowledge to produce semi-quantitative estimates of ES quantities and not to analyse individual or societal preferences or importance of ES. The definition of the objectives and the preparation phase is particularly important in order to define the components of capacity to demand ES chain to be addressed. The objectives and the ES components addressed will influence the composition of the expert panel. We recommend an individual ‡ ‡ © Campagne C, Roche P. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.filling of an empty matrix in order to strengthen the statistical analysis of the scores' variability and the analysis of congruency between experts. Expert scoring should follow a process of discussion, information-sharing and collective appropriation of a list of ecosystem types and ES to be assessed. We suggest that the ES matrix should not only focus on ES central scores but also address the variabilities and uncertainties as part of the ES assessment. The analysis of these sources of variability allows the documentation of variations in the ES quantity but also an exploration into the lack of consensus or knowledge gaps that needs to be addressed.

show abstract

“…We agree with Schröter et al (2012) by considering that made "an important contribution to the development of mapping supply and demand of ES".…”

Section: Flexibilitysupporting

confidence: 76%

Section: Integrativementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

May the matrix be with you! Guidelines for the application of expert-based matrix approach for ecosystem services assessment and mapping

Campagne¹,

Roche²

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The capacity of marine habitats to provide ecosystem services is defined as the long-term potential of ecosystems to provide services that support directly and indirectly human wellbeing (Schröter et al, 2012). The MES matrix combines 13 MES on the x-axis defined according to Salomidi The MES capacity for EUNIS marine habitats were ranked based on their capacity to provide ES on a scale from 0 (absent/negligible) to 2 (very high).…”

Section: Objective 4: Marine Ecosystem Services Capacitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi-objective spatial tools to inform maritime spatial planning in the Adriatic Sea

Depellegrin

Menegon

Farella

et al. 2017

Science of The Total Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research presents a set of multi-objective spatial tools for sea planning and environmental management in the Adriatic Sea Basin. The tools address four objectives: 1) assessment of cumulative impacts from anthropogenic sea uses on environmental components of marine areas; 2) analysis of sea use conflicts; 3) 3-D hydrodynamic modelling of nutrient dispersion (nitrogen and phosphorus) from riverine sources in the Adriatic Sea Basin and 4) marine ecosystem services capacity assessment from seabed habitats based on an ES matrix approach. Geospatial modelling results were illustrated and analysed for three biogeographic subdivisions, Northern-Central-Southern Adriatic Sea. The paper discusses model results for their spatial implications, relevance for sea planning, limitations and concludes with an outlook towards the need for more integrated, multi-functional tools development for sea planning.

show abstract

“…Attention has been recently given to the scale of ES provision, the location of beneficiaries, and the flows of ES from ecosystems to humans, which are particularly relevant for spatially-confined ES (Locatelli et al 2011b;Bagstad et al 2013;Luck et al 2012;Schröter et al 2012). For example, Wendland et al (2010) considered the location of beneficiaries of water ES in Madagascar, as well as directional water flows in landscapes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in Costa Rica

Locatelli

Imbach

Wunder³

2013

Envir. Conserv.

104

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Environmental Conservation 41 (1): 27-36 C Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2013. The online version of this article is published within an open access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence . The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use. doi:10.1017/S0376892913000234 Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in Costa Rica

show abstract

How and where to map supply and demand of ecosystem services for policy-relevant outcomes?

Cited by 60 publications

References 8 publications

May the matrix be with you! Guidelines for the application of expert-based matrix approach for ecosystem services assessment and mapping

May the matrix be with you! Guidelines for the application of expert-based matrix approach for ecosystem services assessment and mapping

Multi-objective spatial tools to inform maritime spatial planning in the Adriatic Sea

Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in Costa Rica

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About