2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsis.2017.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How and why trust matters in post-adoptive usage: The mediating roles of internal and external self-efficacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
55
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
3
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noted that consumers' trust is based on perceiving that the product or service will perform its proposed and required functions [29]. Moreover, reliability will have a positive influence on trust in the adoption of IoT, as reported by Tam et al [19,29]. Because errors are not acceptable to end-users, there is a huge impact of the absence of errors on trust towards IoT adoption [30].…”
Section: Product-related Factorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is noted that consumers' trust is based on perceiving that the product or service will perform its proposed and required functions [29]. Moreover, reliability will have a positive influence on trust in the adoption of IoT, as reported by Tam et al [19,29]. Because errors are not acceptable to end-users, there is a huge impact of the absence of errors on trust towards IoT adoption [30].…”
Section: Product-related Factorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[18] defined trust as "the willingness of a party to be vulnerable to the actions of another party based on the expectations that the other party will perform a particular action important to the trustor, irrespective of the ability to monitor or control that other party" (p. 172). The latest technology adoption research has focused on trust as a critical driver of technology usage behaviors [19].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A user's decision to adopt a certain technology can critically depend on the level of trust the user has in the technology (Tams et al, 2018). In general, IoT-based solutions comprise different types of interconnected devices collecting and processing (personal) data.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trust has been addressed from two perspectives: a) trust in government behaviour through business processes performed on social media applications (Park, Choi, Kim, & Rho, 2015), and b) trust in people, either government officials or citizens in their use of social media applications (Hong, 2013). However, trust in the technological part of social media has remained largely ignored (Tams, Thatcher, & Craig, 2018). We have however adopted the viewpoint of (Mcknight et al, 2011), who defines trust in technology as the actual relationship between users and the technology in terms of functionality, helpfulness and reliability.…”
Section: Trust In Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%