2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-2471-9_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How are AGN Found?

Abstract: We discuss the very different methods in each wavelength band for selecting and finding Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN). We briefly review the history of the different techniques for finding AGN and compare and contrast the advantages and difficulties of selection in different wavelength bands. We stress the strong selection effects in each wavelength band and the difficulty of defining complete samples. Of all the techniques presently used, we conclude that selection in the hard X-ray band via imaging and spectr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…X-ray observations are claimed to be a very direct tracer of AGN activity (e.g., Mushotzky 2004). The radiation originates very close to the supermassive black hole, it can leave these regions rather unabsorbed, in particular at energies of a few keV, and there is little contamination from other sources, such as stars.…”
Section: Co-located X-ray Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…X-ray observations are claimed to be a very direct tracer of AGN activity (e.g., Mushotzky 2004). The radiation originates very close to the supermassive black hole, it can leave these regions rather unabsorbed, in particular at energies of a few keV, and there is little contamination from other sources, such as stars.…”
Section: Co-located X-ray Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since X-ray observations have been claimed to be a very good tracer of AGN activity (e.g., Mushotzky 2004;Brandt & Hasinger 2005), the lack of X-ray counterparts to almost 1/3 of the VLBI-detected sources deserves a closer look.…”
Section: Potential Causes Of the X-ray Non-detectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of X-ray observations for constraining these properties are twofold. Firstly, selection at high energies yields AGN samples that are least biased in terms of either line-of-sight obscuration or dilution by stellar light from the host galaxy (Comastri et al 2002;Severgnini et al 2003;Mushotzky 2004;Georgantopoulos & Georgakakis 2005). Secondly, because the X-ray flux emitted by AGN is believed to originate at small scales close to the SMBH, spectroscopy at high energies is a unique diagnostic of the accretion properties and the geometry of the material in the vicinity of the central engine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hard X-rays can directly probe AGN activity, are uncontaminated by star formation processes at the X-ray luminosities of interest, and detect all but the most absorbed sources. Thus, hard X-ray surveys provide as complete and unbiased a sample of AGNs as is presently possible (e.g., Mushotzky 2004), although they will still miss Compton-thick sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%