2014
DOI: 10.1353/jhe.2014.0025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Are Community College Students Assessed and Placed in Developmental Math?: Grounding Our Understanding in Reality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice however, very few institutions use noncognitive measures for placement purposes (Gerlaugh et al 2007;Hughes and Scott-Clayton 2011). This may be due to faculty perceptions that self-reported student information is inaccurate or irrelevant (Melguizo et al 2014), or to the lack of evidence about their ability to improve placement decisions.…”
Section: Noncognitive Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In practice however, very few institutions use noncognitive measures for placement purposes (Gerlaugh et al 2007;Hughes and Scott-Clayton 2011). This may be due to faculty perceptions that self-reported student information is inaccurate or irrelevant (Melguizo et al 2014), or to the lack of evidence about their ability to improve placement decisions.…”
Section: Noncognitive Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, qualitative research has found that faculty and staff often do not feel supported in the identification and validation of measures that can be incorporated into placement rules, while others perceive measures besides test scores to be insignificant (Melguizo et al 2014). Given the numerous studies demonstrating the predictive validity of these other measures, it is important to gather evidence on the usefulness of measures for making course placement decisions.…”
Section: Using Multiple Measures For Course Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations