How are global health policies transferred to sub-Saharan Africa countries? A systematic critical review of literature

Abstract

Background Most sub-Saharan Africa countries adopt global health policies. However, mechanisms with which policy transfers occur have largely been studied amongst developed countries and much less in low- and middle- income countries. The current review sought to contribute to literature in this area by exploring how health policy agendas have been transferred from global to national level in sub-Saharan Africa. This is particularly important in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) era as there are many policy prepositions by global actors to be transferred to national level for example the World Health Organization (WHO) policy principles of health financing reforms that advance Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Methods We conducted a critical review of literature following Arksey and O’Malley framework for conducting reviews. We searched EBSCOhost, ProQuest, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google scholar for articles. We combined the concepts and synonyms of “policy transfer” with those of “sub-Saharan Africa” using Boolean operators in searching databases. Data were analyzed thematically, and results presented narratively. Results Nine articles satisfied our eligibility criteria. The predominant policy transfer mechanism in the health sector in sub-Saharan Africa is voluntarism. There are cases of coercion, however, even in the face of coercion, there is usually some level of negotiation. Agency, context and nature of the issue are key influencers in policy transfers. The transfer is likely to be smooth if it is mainly technical and changes are within the confines of a given disease programmatic area. Policies with potential implications on bureaucratic and political status quo are more challenging to transfer. Conclusion Policy transfer, irrespective of the mechanism, requires local alignment and appreciation of context by the principal agents, availability of financial resources, a coordination platform and good working relations amongst stakeholders. Potential effects of the policy on the bureaucratic structure and political status are also important during the policy transfer process.

Engaging Community Health Workers (CHWs) in Africa: Lessons from the Canadian Red Cross supported programs

“…This means meaningful participation that is “inclusive, accessible and supportive” of the community [ 26 ]. Alignment with partner organizations such as UNICEF, CARE, or USAID can be particularly valuable, as these organizations possess established relationships and networks within communities that can be leveraged to support community engagement efforts [ 27 ].…”

“…This is vital for improved sustainability of CHW programs. Key decision-makers should possess an understanding of the local context while financial resources, coordination platforms, and strong relationships among stakeholders should be available [ 27 ]. The participatory approach proves beneficial in facilitating the handover of programs during exit as it encourages the continuous involvement of stakeholders throughout the program’s lifespan.…”

International climate finance mechanisms: A review with focus on Africa

“…Furthermore, the systematic mapping and review of evidence on the implementation of natural climate solutions (NCS) provide insights into the factors influencing the implementation of nature-based and ecosystem-based approaches to addressing climate change, emphasizing the need for context-specific strategies and interventions (Schulte et al, 2021). The role of international organizations in guiding and influencing health financing reforms in sub-Saharan African countries further illustrates the influence of global policies and guidelines on domestic climate finance and adaptation efforts (Odoch et al, 2022).…”

The AU-EU Partnership and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Moving towards health sovereignty in Africa?

“…One of the consensual aspects of enhancing health sovereignty is the strengthening of health systems, the management of human and material resources and of oversight mechanisms such as regulatory frameworks based upon a set of common standards of performance, accountability, and transparency. Thus, the adoption of institutional reforms raises the issue of how to square the transfer of concepts, policies, and models to Africa with health sovereignty in donor-recipient relationship (Odoch et al, 2022).…”