How are large-scale One Health initiatives targeting infectious diseases and antimicrobial resistance evaluated? A scoping review

The Characterization and Beta-Lactam Resistance of Staphylococcal Community Recovered from Raw Bovine Milk

“…The prevalence of mecA is a relatively low rate. However, as mentioned earlier, it poses a potential danger because resistance genes in bacteria are mostly mobile genetic elements and resistance development is in constant exchange among bacteria [ 58 ]. The multidrug resistance levels of the isolates in this study are moderately risky.…”

Navigating One Health in research-for-development: Reflections on the design and implementation of the CGIAR Initiative on One Health

“…in livestock and aquaculture farms for WP3 and watersheds for WP4). Often One Health issues are addressed in isolation [ 10 ]; the integration we achieved between WPs might not have been realized had we not given priority to fostering integration among them.…”

“…In a systematic review of challenges in conducting One Health initiatives, the biggest knowledge gap was the lack of monitoring and evaluation studies demonstrating what works and why [ 8 ], highlighting the need for learning from One Health efforts. Qualitative evaluations are particularly absent [ 10 ]. This piece is a product of a reflection exercise conducted to qualitatively evaluate our initiative's processes.…”

“…The understanding of collaborative One Health strategies, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), remains relatively under-explored [ 7 , 8 ]. In addition, current attention is focused on coordinated response contexts [ [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] ] with little reflection on other One Health actions such as research. Researchers engaged in research-for-development initiatives – where research is used as a tool to address development challenges – have insightful experiences working not only across disciplines to generate evidence but also across sectors with partners engaged in practice and policy to foster an environment for evidence use, which are under-documented [ 12 ].…”

Attitudes of South Korean consumers toward the prudent use of antimicrobials in livestock animals

“…To combat AMR, the One Health approach takes the complex and ecological nature of AMR into account and addresses it multi-sectorally by involving multiple stakeholders to communicate and work together to achieve better public health outcomes and increase the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of field interventions, surveillance, and health policies for mitigating AMR [ 15 , 19 , 20 ]. The World Health Organization (WHO), the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH) have joined forces to develop a Global Action Plan on AMR that specifies five strategic objectives for tackling AMR: improving awareness and understanding, strengthening knowledge and evidence, reducing the incidence of infection, optimizing the use of antimicrobials, and promoting sustainable investments [ 21 ].…”