2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02392-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How are patient-reported outcomes and symptoms being measured in adults with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma? A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PROs are important for evaluating patients' HRQoL, but are often suboptimally reported, with deficits including failure to account for missing data from analyses, potential measurement bias, and missed reporting criteria that can potentially improve future PRO studies 2 . The impact of treatment with Rd‐based regimens on PROs in patients with RRMM has been studied previously; overall, and similar to POLLUX, these studies demonstrated maintenance of HRQoL and few differences in HRQoL outcomes between experimental and control arms when on treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PROs are important for evaluating patients' HRQoL, but are often suboptimally reported, with deficits including failure to account for missing data from analyses, potential measurement bias, and missed reporting criteria that can potentially improve future PRO studies 2 . The impact of treatment with Rd‐based regimens on PROs in patients with RRMM has been studied previously; overall, and similar to POLLUX, these studies demonstrated maintenance of HRQoL and few differences in HRQoL outcomes between experimental and control arms when on treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PROs are an increasingly important metric for evaluating MM treatment, but are inconsistently and sub-optimally reported; drawing conclusions is often impossible because of the limited information reported. 13 There are few published studies regarding the impact of Vd-based regimens on HRQoL in patients with RRMM. In general, rather than improvement, these studies have found no change from baseline HRQoL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2,5 Since treatment until disease progression (rather than a fixed-duration regimen) is recommended, 6,10 and because treatment with novel agents has extended progression-free survival (PFS), 11 assessment of the impact of treatment on patients' long-term HRQoL is warranted. 3,7,9,12,13 Moreover, MM is primarily a disease of older persons 1 for whom treatment selection may be complicated by co-morbidities, such as diabetes or cardiovascular disease. 14 Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including evaluation of the impact of treatment on HRQoL, offer valuable insights to supplement clinical endpoints and aid in therapeutic decision-making.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may indicate that the POM/DEX treatment regimen does not adversely affect patients QoL, which was also suggested from the MM‐003 trial, in which POM/DEX even led to improved QoL compared to DEX alone, 31 although the analyzed questionnaire domains and the survey periods in the MM‐003 differed slightly from those analyzed in the present study. Control and maintenance of treatment‐related impacts on QoL have been rated as particularly important in patients with R/RMM who have received many lines of therapies increasing the risk of cumulative toxicities and side effects 32 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%