How Billionaires Explain Their Philanthropy: A Mixed-Method Analysis of the Giving Pledge Letters

Abstract

This study investigates a discourse about billionaire philanthropy established in letters submitted by 187 of 209 signatories of the Giving Pledge. The philanthropy of the wealthy is gaining increasing public attention and is subject to growing criticism, which demands additional study of how the wealthy collectively explain their generosity. The mixed-method analysis finds a strong emphasis on education and health causes and identifies two distinct and coherent rationales for being generous. The majority of letters express a social–normative rationale, consisting of two prevailing explanations: an expressed gratitude and desire to “give back” (1) and references to family upbringing as a socializing force (2). A minority of letters articulate a personal–consequentialist rationale, highlighting three separate explanations: a large inheritance may harm offspring (1), giving as personal gratification (2), and an acknowledgment of excess wealth with no better use (3). An expressed desire to have impact and make a difference appears in both rationales. The overall dominance of a social–normative rationale projects a discourse emphasizing benevolence as well as a narrative in which billionaires are an exceptionally productive and grateful subset of society. While previous studies have primarily focused on identifying individual psychological motives, this study shows how the Giving Pledge letters reflect a philanthropic discourse among the wealthy going back to Andrew Carnegie’s Gospel of Wealth.

How Charitable Were the Elites of the Dutch Golden Age?

“…In the literature, this is typically referred to as: “noblesse oblige, often said to be typical of the attitudes of the privileged toward the rest of society, stated as the felt responsibility of the privileged to return some of the share to those considered less fortunate” (Ostrander, 1980, p. 31). Noblesse oblige is cultivated through families, but also through educational institutions which wealthy children attend, not in the least because these thrive through the generous contributions made by these children later in life (Odendahl, 1989; Schmitz et al, 2021).…”

The Routledge Handbook of Taxation and Philanthropy

“…However, his astonishing example symbolizes an exception rather than a rule amidst the ultra-wealthy. Even signatories of the Giving Pledge, who freely committed to donating at least half of their wealth during their lifetime or at death have not successfully managed to keep the promise so far (Schmitz et al, 2021). Furthermore, this initiative struggled to gather almost 10% of the world's billionaires, despite the extraordinary momentum for global philanthropy.…”

Epistolizing accountability: a critical exploration of INGO annual report leaders' letters

“…Discretionary narrative disclosures, such as CEO letters, have been framed as a proxy for corporate reputation (Craig and Brennan, 2012), with the disclosures made in these letters ‘directly influenced by the image management wants to convey’ (Geppert and Lawrence, 2008, p. 286). In their study of the letters published by wealthy individuals who sign the Giving Pledge, Schmitz et al . (2021, p. 513) argue that ‘we consider the [Giving Pledge] letters not just as vessels of data to derive individual motives, but as social products of, and contributions to, elite philanthropic discourse’.…”