2021
DOI: 10.1002/mar.21609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How brand self‐disclosure helps brands create intimacy with customers: The role of information valence and anthropomorphism

Abstract: Although the notion of self-disclosure has received wide attention since the new millennium, most studies on this topic focus on consumer disclosure, leaving unexamined if brands could benefit from self-disclosure. Therefore, the question remains unanswered if the positive effects of brand self-disclosure on important relational and transactional variables observed in other contexts than consumer-brand relationships would be observed if self-disclosure was made by brands. This study addresses this question, sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major contribution of this paper is that it has clarified the psychological mechanism underlying the CASA framework by examining the serial mediation of user emotional disclosure and perceived intimacy. Social penetration theory supports our findings that emotional disclosure compels a conversational partner to have the same level of disclosure to maintain reciprocity (Carpenter & Greene, 2016), which then leads to higher intimacy with the conversational partner (Carpenter & Greene, 2016;Fehr, 2004;Lee et al, 2020) and various beneficial outcomes such as lower depression (Reis & Franks, 1994) and higher social support satisfaction (Johnson et al, 1993), perceived understanding (Reis et al, 2017), enjoyment of self-insight and personal growth (Reis & Shaver, 1988), purchase intention (Yin et al, 2019), continuous intention (Lin et al, 2021), and repurchase intention (Huaman-Ramirez et al, 2022). Uncertainty reduction theory further supports the effect of initial emotional disclosure in reducing uncertainty in an early-stage relationship and increasing the level of emotional exchange (Berger & Calabrese, 1975), which can lead to a feeling of being understood and successful psychotherapeutic alliances (Elliott et al, 2011), satisfaction and behavior change (Sanford, 2006), and other benefits (Reis et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The major contribution of this paper is that it has clarified the psychological mechanism underlying the CASA framework by examining the serial mediation of user emotional disclosure and perceived intimacy. Social penetration theory supports our findings that emotional disclosure compels a conversational partner to have the same level of disclosure to maintain reciprocity (Carpenter & Greene, 2016), which then leads to higher intimacy with the conversational partner (Carpenter & Greene, 2016;Fehr, 2004;Lee et al, 2020) and various beneficial outcomes such as lower depression (Reis & Franks, 1994) and higher social support satisfaction (Johnson et al, 1993), perceived understanding (Reis et al, 2017), enjoyment of self-insight and personal growth (Reis & Shaver, 1988), purchase intention (Yin et al, 2019), continuous intention (Lin et al, 2021), and repurchase intention (Huaman-Ramirez et al, 2022). Uncertainty reduction theory further supports the effect of initial emotional disclosure in reducing uncertainty in an early-stage relationship and increasing the level of emotional exchange (Berger & Calabrese, 1975), which can lead to a feeling of being understood and successful psychotherapeutic alliances (Elliott et al, 2011), satisfaction and behavior change (Sanford, 2006), and other benefits (Reis et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…359, 368). Extant research has found a positive effect of emotional disclosure on perceived intimacy with a conversational partner (Carpenter & Greene, 2016;Ho et al, 2018;Lee et al, 2020), which then leads to several positive outcomes such as lower depression (Reis & Franks, 1994), and higher social support satisfaction (Johnson et al, 1993), perceived understanding (Reis et al, 2017), enjoyment of self-insight and personal growth (Reis & Shaver, 1988), purchase intention (Yin et al, 2019), continuous intention (Lin et al, 2021), and repurchase intention (Huaman-Ramirez et al, 2022).…”
Section: Mediating the Role Of Perceived Intimacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, Huxhold et al (2022) posit that relationship reminders are often used to develop emotional closeness in social ties. In the context of marketing, because consumers show favorable responses to brands with whom they have emotional closeness (Huaman‐Ramirez et al, 2022), relationship reminders can be beneficial to cultivating positive outcomes for brands (Cavanaugh, 2014; Senyuz & Hasford, 2022). Relationship reminders can help brands increase the desire for conspicuous consumption (Liu et al, 2020), create a connection with consumers (Shen et al, 2016; Wuchty, 2009), and build emotional closeness with consumers (Fiori et al, 2020).…”
Section: Theoretical Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereby, frontline employee self-disclosure may lead customers to appreciate that the employee has the ability to deliver promised values. Also, feelings of closeness may develop an emotional connection and attach special meaning between interaction partners (Huaman-Ramirez et al, 2022). Customers who find the self-disclosing employee close to them are thus likely to believe that the employee has a genuine concern about them (Güse & Haelg, 2009) and feel a sense of benevolence from the employee.…”
Section: Customer Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current research contributes to the self-disclosure literature from a marketing perspective in the following ways. As shown in a recent review of Huaman-Ramirez et al (2022), the majority of prior research has focused on consumers' motivation to reveal private information in human-computer interactions (e.g., Cheung et al, 2015;Chou et al, 2009) and the effect of corporate self-disclosure on stakeholder responses (e.g., Fennis & Stroebe, 2014;Hegner et al, 2018), but relatively little attention has been given to how self-disclosure influences customer responses in service encounters.…”
Section: Theoretical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%