2022
DOI: 10.1111/nph.18477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How broad is the selfing syndrome? Insights from convergent evolution of gene expression across species and tissues in the Capsella genus

Abstract: The shift from outcrossing to selfing is one of the main evolutionary transitions in plants. It is accompanied by profound effects on reproductive traits, the so-called selfing syndrome. Because the transition to selfing also implies deep genomic and ecological changes, one also expects to observe a genomic selfing syndrome.We took advantage of the three independent transitions from outcrossing to selfing in the Capsella genus to characterize the overall impact of mating system change on RNA expression, in flo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In flowering plants, evolutionary transitions from outcrossing to predominant selfing are associated with a set of predictable changes in both morphological traits and genetic features of the genome. These convergent and parallel changes have been termed the ‘morphological selfing syndrome’ and the ‘genomic selfing syndrome’, respectively (Sicard & Lenhard, 2011; Cutter, 2019; Tsuchimatsu & Fujii, 2022; Zhang et al ., 2022). Species with moderate‐to‐high selfing rates often exhibit smaller flowers, a loss of herkogamy (stigma‐anther separation), reduced pollen production and pollinator rewards (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In flowering plants, evolutionary transitions from outcrossing to predominant selfing are associated with a set of predictable changes in both morphological traits and genetic features of the genome. These convergent and parallel changes have been termed the ‘morphological selfing syndrome’ and the ‘genomic selfing syndrome’, respectively (Sicard & Lenhard, 2011; Cutter, 2019; Tsuchimatsu & Fujii, 2022; Zhang et al ., 2022). Species with moderate‐to‐high selfing rates often exhibit smaller flowers, a loss of herkogamy (stigma‐anther separation), reduced pollen production and pollinator rewards (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…scent and nectar) compared with related outcrossing species and populations (Lloyd, 1965; Morgan & Barrett, 1989; Ritland & Ritland, 1989; Liao et al ., 2022; Zeng et al ., 2022). Concomitantly, persistent selfing usually results in changes in genetic parameters, including reduced heterozygosity and nucleotide diversity, increased linkage disequilibrium, accumulation of deleterious mutations and changes in gene expression (Charlesworth & Wright, 2001; Wright et al ., 2008; Glémin & Galtier, 2012; Barrett et al ., 2014; Shimizu & Tsuchimatsu, 2015; Zhang et al ., 2022). The evolution of morphological and genomic syndromes accompanying the transition from outcrossing to selfing can involve both adaptive and nonadaptive processes (Cutter, 2019; Rifkin et al ., 2019; Liao et al ., 2022; Tsuchimatsu & Fujii, 2022; Zhang et al ., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intermediate states between both strategies – known as mixed mating systems – are ubiquitous in the wild (Goodwillie et al ., 2005). However, even though mixed mating is common (Aide, 1986; Barrett & Eckert, 1990), a transition towards selfing is expected to occur in most plant groups according to the evolutionary history of many taxa (Levin & Kerster, 1974; Zhang et al ., 2022). The adaptive consequences of selfing are known since classical works from Darwin and Fisher, who hypothesised a high spreading ability of self-fertilisation alleles because of the transmission of the whole genetic material and the independence of mates and pollination vectors, conferring a reproductive assurance and granting colonising opportunities (Darwin, 1877; Fisher, 1949; Lloyd, 1979; Lloyd, 1992; Holsinger, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It remains unclear how phenotypic convergence may evolve independently from different genes; secondly, most associations between genomic convergence and phenotype adaptation were based on simple functional assumptions and lack empirical validation. Notably, these challenges also apply to other cases of phenotypic convergence currently reported in plants: metal toxicity tolerance in Arabidopsis (Preite et al ., 2019 ), seed colour in common bean (McClean et al ., 2018 ), the transition of outcrossing to selfing (Zhang et al ., 2022 ), perenniality in rice and sorghum (Hu et al ., 2003 ) and the development of plant shoot lateral organs (Naramoto et al ., 2019 ). The limited cases of convergence evolution indicate that our understanding of plant phenotypic evolution remains fragmentary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%