2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How buyer–seller relationship orientation affects adaptation of sales processes to the buying process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This generates an iterative value creation process formed by continued knowledge exchange and adjustment (Toon et al, 2012) Relationalism in co-management facilitates the structured inclusion of upstream and downstream external value chain agents in bringing about exchange-based adaptation in the process (Viio & Grönroos, 2015) Situational Dynamics…”
Section: Structural Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This generates an iterative value creation process formed by continued knowledge exchange and adjustment (Toon et al, 2012) Relationalism in co-management facilitates the structured inclusion of upstream and downstream external value chain agents in bringing about exchange-based adaptation in the process (Viio & Grönroos, 2015) Situational Dynamics…”
Section: Structural Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sum, we have evidence suggesting that customers do not perceive that having a greater influence on a supplier's innovation activities contributes to building the supplier-customer capability profile (Möller et al 2003). The lack of evidence on the expected association between SOW and perceived influence on supplier innovation furthermore suggests that such perceived influence does not contribute to relationship quality (Ford 1980;Dorsch et al 1998;Viio et al 2016), noting that such relationship quality has previously been positively associated with SOW (Dorsch et al 1998: 132, Hypothesis 1c.). ============ Figure 8 about here ============…”
Section: ============ Figure 6 About Here ============mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This suggests that from the perspective of the customer, perceived product innovativeness does neither seem to be a relevant aspect of relationship quality (e.g. Ford 1980;Dorsch et al 1998), nor does it support that a greater value of buyer-supplier relationship orientation has been generated through product adaptation as part of a shift from a more transactional toward a relationship orientation (Viio et al 2016). This inability or irrelevance of converting relational assets into customer value (Srivastava et al 1998) suggests that frameworks other than a resource-based-view (Barney 1991;Kraaijenbrink et al 2010) could be more constructive for understanding this specific customer-supplier issue at hand.…”
Section: ============ Figure 6 About Here ============mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…How public value and customer value are interrelated is important to address, but goes outside the scope of this article. We draw on the thoughts of Viio and Grönroos (2016), who state that the sales process should "strategically match…the buyer's situation". In our example, the buyer is society itself, represented by e.g., states and municipalities.…”
Section: Selling Through Failurementioning
confidence: 99%