How Can Physical Activity Be Promoted Among Children and Adolescents? A Systematic Review of Reviews Across Settings

Abstract

Introduction: A vast majority of children and adolescents are physically inactive. As a result, high obesity rates and related diseases have made physical activity promotion a politically relevant topic. In order to form the basis for political decision making, evidence is required regarding the efficacy and effectiveness of interventions for physical activity promotion. In contrast to previous research, this systematic review of reviews targets three key settings (family and home, childcare, school), and is among the largest to have been conducted.Methods: A systematic review of reviews was conducted as part of a large-scale project to develop national recommendations for physical activity promotion in Germany. Six electronic databases were searched and inclusion criteria were defined. Two independent reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of potentially relevant literature. 213 reviews were identified and categorised by target group. A total of 74 reviews were identified dealing with children and adolescents. Each review underwent a quality assessment.Results: 39 reviews with the highest quality and relevance were analysed. Three reviews focused on the family and home setting, 4 on the childcare setting, 28 on the school setting and 4 on other settings. Evidence revealed the key role played by parents in promoting physical activity in children within each setting. Furthermore, evidence pointed toward the efficacy of multi-component interventions in the childcare and school setting. Several evidence-based intervention strategies were identified for childcare facilities and schools.Discussion: The review of reviews identified a number of promising strategies for PA promotion among children and adolescents. Among reviews, multi-component interventions in childcare facilities and schools stand out prominently. At the same time, the review of reviews indicated that there is still a lack of studies on the efficacy of interventions that go beyond the individual level. We recommend that future research should also target community and policy level interventions and interventions other than the school setting. In order to make more specific recommendations regarding the scale-up of promising intervention strategies, further knowledge about the effectiveness, health equity and cost effectiveness of interventions is needed.

<p>Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome and Its Association with Sociodemographic Characteristics in Participants of a Public Chronic Disease Control Program in Medellin, Colombia, in 2018</p>

“…In addition, it is a risk factor for which effective and cost-effective interventions are available. [26][27][28] Schooling had an effect independent of sex, age, physical activity level, and place of residence, with a higher risk in subjects belonging to a lower educational status, which demonstrated the importance of this social health determinant to improve the health actions. As indicated in previous publications, the identification of this type of health determinant is key for guiding programs focused on the prevention of health inequalities (in this case, in the distribution of metabolic syndrome) according to social status.…”

Using Physical Education to Promote Leisure-Time Physical Activity in Lower Secondary School Students: The PETALS Trial

“…Given the importance of promoting physical activity among young people, researchers have sought to identify effective strategies and contexts to enhance physical activity in this population [12]. Physical education (PE) has been identi ed as a potentially viable existing network on which interventionists can capitalize to deliver physical activity interventions to a broad, diverse, and captive audience of young people [13,14].…”

A real world feasibility trial of the PLAYshop: an intervention to facilitate parent engagement in developing their child’s physical literacy

“…Physical inactivity has emerged as a public health pandemic (Kohl 3rd et al, 2012) and internationally the prevalence of children participating in sufficient levels of physical activity remains low (Aubert et al, 2018). In response, researchers have developed and tested the effectiveness of numerous childhood physical activity interventions (Messing et al, 2019). Amidst some success, their impact has been limited (Longmuir & Tremblay, 2016;Love, Adams, & van Sluijs, 2019) and several research gaps remain.…”

“…A systematic review of the determinants of physical activity in children aged 0-6 years found that parent monitoring was the only factor consistently associated with children's physical activity (Hesketh et al, 2017). More recently, a synthesis of results from 39 high-quality reviews (Messing et al, 2019) provided strong evidence that parents play a key role in promoting child physical activity across various community settings.…”