How can task shifting put patient safety at risk? A qualitative study of experiences among general practitioners in Norway

Abstract

Objective: To describe experiences among general practitioners (GPs) in Norway regarding horizontal task shifting experiences associated with adverse events that potentially put patient safety at risk. Design and contributors: We conducted a qualitative study with data from a retrospective convenience sample of consecutive, already posted comments in a restricted Facebook group for GPs in Norway. The sample consisted of 43 unique posts from 38 contributors (23 women and 15 men), presenting thick and specific accounts of potentially adverse events in the context of horizontal task shifting. Analysis was conducted with systematic text condensation, a method for thematic cross-case analysis. Results: Contributing GPs reported several types of adverse events associated with horizontal task shifting that could put patient safety at risk. They described how spill-over work dispatched to GPs may generate administrative hassle and hazardous delay of necessary examinations. Overdiagnosis, reduced access and endangered accountability occur when time-consuming procedures and pre-investigation before referral are pushed upon GPs. Resource-draining chores beyond GPs' proficiency is also dispatched without appropriate instruction or equipment. Furthermore, potential malpractice is imposed by hospital colleagues who overrule the GPs' medical judgement. Implications: Patient safety is endangered when horizontal task shifting is initiated and performed without a systematic process involving all stakeholders that considers available resources. A risk and vulnerability analysis, securing competent staff, resources, time and equipment before launching such reforms is necessary to protect patient safety. Infrastructure comprised of local coordination groups may facilitate dialogue between health care service levels and negotiate responsibilities and workload. KEY POINTS Task shifting between different levels of health care is a relevant and legitimate strategy for planning and policy. GPs in Norway report adverse events related to task shifting from specialist colleagues without proper resource allocation. Patient safety may be put at risk by hazardous delay, overdiagnosis, endangered accountability and potential malpractice. Planning and implementation of task shifting must involve all system levels and relevant stakeholders to ensure patient safety.

Conceptual framework for task shifting and task sharing: an international Delphi study

“…Although health care tasks might be redistributed to providers with less training to deliver cost savings or improve operational efficiencies, this purpose statement reinforces that TS/S occurs when health care redistribution and delegation is driven by efforts to enhance health equity by meeting the health needs of underserved populations [ 1 , 18 , 19 ]. The general purpose statement also asserts that TS/S achieves its goals without compromising the standards of care, including maintaining safety and quality [ 20 – 23 ]. Opportunities arising from TS/S programmes (Blue Box) The COATS Framework offers five opportunities for TS/S programmes to deliver health system improvements, depending on the implementation context.…”

Validation and initial results of surveys exploring perspectives on risks and solutions for diagnostic and medication errors in primary care in Sweden

“…In another study, five additional factors were suggested as unique for primary care and not included in in YCFF; timely access, primary-secondary interface, continuity of care, task performance (skill and competence) and enough time in the consultation [ 11 ]. Primary–secondary interface reflects our dimension Shared information and cooperation and the risk of horizontal task-shifting has been pointed out earlier [ 25 ]. Continuity of care reflects our dimension Risks in the environment/in the work conditions.…”

Changes in work stress among doctors in Norway from 2010 to 2019: a study based on repeated surveys

“…33 A study among GPs in 2018 showed the potential negative effects of task shifting from hospital specialists and other specialists to GPs on patient safety such as the hazardous delay of necessary examinations, or insufficient treatment due to lack of resources or risk of malpractice. 34 A study with data from 2018 documented long working weeks with a wide variety of tasks among GPs. 14 15 The evaluation study of 'The Regular General Practitioners Scheme' from 2019 35 confirmed significant growth in workloads for GPs during the last years that were related to increase both in new tasks and in the volume of established tasks.…”