2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65368-6_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Can the Use of Data from Computer-Delivered Assessments Improve the Measurement of Twenty-First Century Skills?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, most of the inaccurate readers were also slow readers and were, therefore, identified by the reading fluency criteria in GBA. It could also be argued that the skill assessments with our GBA provide more information than the assessments with the traditional PPT (Greiff et al, 2015;Ramalingam & Adams, 2018). Therefore, although the grade-normative data from GBA was less sensitive when compared with PPT data, it could be that our GBA was more sensitive in finding subtle differences in students' skills, and this kind of information could be useful for picking out students who seemingly are typically developing readers but who might in fact be borderline cases and might benefit from some extra attention and instruction to improve their reading skills further.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, most of the inaccurate readers were also slow readers and were, therefore, identified by the reading fluency criteria in GBA. It could also be argued that the skill assessments with our GBA provide more information than the assessments with the traditional PPT (Greiff et al, 2015;Ramalingam & Adams, 2018). Therefore, although the grade-normative data from GBA was less sensitive when compared with PPT data, it could be that our GBA was more sensitive in finding subtle differences in students' skills, and this kind of information could be useful for picking out students who seemingly are typically developing readers but who might in fact be borderline cases and might benefit from some extra attention and instruction to improve their reading skills further.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, CBA has been designed to include dynamic assessment for the use of computerized adaptive testing (Navarro et al, 2018), which has already shown to work among primary school children in mathematical skills (Martin & Lazendic, 2018). Furthermore, such CBA shows potential for using log files to investigate learning process and gaining detailed data to increase the validity and reliability of the assessment (Ramalingam & Adams, 2018) and in interpreting the individual responses (Greiff, Wu¨stenberg, & Avvisati, 2015). If a CBA is designed so that it functions as an integrated part of a digital game, assessments in a game environment can keep young students more engaged and motivated than traditional assessments encouraging students to demonstrate their full potential (e.g., Perrotta, Featherstone, Aston, & Houghton, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When dealing with complex problem-solving tasks, the analysis of the processing steps and sequences makes it possible to distinguish successful processing strategies from less successful ones. Ramalingdam and Adams (2018) showed that the reliability and validity of the scale in the field of digital reading can be increased by using log-file data. In the context of their study, only multiple choice items were considered.…”
Section: Increased Reliability: Use Of Log-file Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When an assessment is delivered via computer, every interaction of the test-taker with the test may be easily recorded, making it possible to collect far more information about student activities during the test than has previously been possible (Baker & Mayer, 1999;Chung & Baker, 2003;Schacter et al, 1999). While it is now possible to record such information, what must be addressed if one is to consider making use of such data is whether it is possible to use them to derive valid measures of the construct (Ramalingam & Adams, 2017). That is, to what extent do each of the final product, and measures of the process, reflect the construct of collaboration?…”
Section: Scoring: What Should Be Scored?mentioning
confidence: 99%