2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How can vegetation protect us from air pollution? A critical review on green spaces' mitigation abilities for air-borne particles from a public health perspective - with implications for urban planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
100
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 297 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
5
100
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The average PM 2.5 concentration in the G was 124.5 ± 41.1 µg/m 3 , lower than 132.9 ± 45.4 µg/m 3 in the AG and 133.1 ± 44.6 µg/m 3 in the ASG. The same pattern can be observed for PM 10 . The average PM 10 concentration in the G was 150.3 ± 53.3 µg/m 3 , while in the AG it was 159.2 ± 57.2 µg/m 3 , and in the ASG it was 159.0 ± 57.4 µg/m 3 .…”
Section: Spatial-temporal Variation In the Pm Concentrations And Removal Efficienciessupporting
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The average PM 2.5 concentration in the G was 124.5 ± 41.1 µg/m 3 , lower than 132.9 ± 45.4 µg/m 3 in the AG and 133.1 ± 44.6 µg/m 3 in the ASG. The same pattern can be observed for PM 10 . The average PM 10 concentration in the G was 150.3 ± 53.3 µg/m 3 , while in the AG it was 159.2 ± 57.2 µg/m 3 , and in the ASG it was 159.0 ± 57.4 µg/m 3 .…”
Section: Spatial-temporal Variation In the Pm Concentrations And Removal Efficienciessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, it can be found that the average PM 2.5 and PM 10 concentrations at 1 m from the river in the G were the lowest along the transect. The concentration was 110.7 ± 32.0 µg/m 3 for PM 2.5 and 138.5 ± 40.8 µg/m 3 for PM 10 .…”
Section: Spatial-temporal Variation In the Pm Concentrations And Removal Efficienciesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations