Media, Technology and Education in a Post-Truth Society 2021
DOI: 10.1108/978-1-80043-906-120211010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Can Wikipedia Save Us all?: Assuming Good Faith from all Points of View in the Age of Fake News and Post-truth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefits (and limits) of technology in allowing people to participate in social activities including work and leisure were commented on extensively in our media data. The potential advantages of collective connections through platforms that offered virtual spaces for collective social activities (e.g., Gather) were compared with the intensity of one-to-one connections (e.g., via Zoom) ( 88 ). Despite the possibilities for collective telepresence experiences offered by a range of software, such as watching films and listening to music in remote groups, fears about the “dystopian” possibilities of a more permanent move to online life were common ( 89 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The benefits (and limits) of technology in allowing people to participate in social activities including work and leisure were commented on extensively in our media data. The potential advantages of collective connections through platforms that offered virtual spaces for collective social activities (e.g., Gather) were compared with the intensity of one-to-one connections (e.g., via Zoom) ( 88 ). Despite the possibilities for collective telepresence experiences offered by a range of software, such as watching films and listening to music in remote groups, fears about the “dystopian” possibilities of a more permanent move to online life were common ( 89 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The provision of mobile phone and data packages to homeless people post-pandemic had become part of the charitable offer previously confined to shelter and food ( 101 ). Families reported as struggling during lockdown were able to connected via online games ( 102 ) and charities demanded internet access for older people as a “lifeline” ( 88 ). Actions to address digital inclusion were recommended by the Tackling Loneliness Network including improving access to devices and data ( 99 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite all the above, Konieczny (2021) assures that this crisis of confidence is progressively diminishing. Other experts emphasize the encyclopaedia's efforts to reinforce its trustworthiness, such as the fight against vandalism to avoid article editing wars by varied interests (Zazo et al, 2015;Sant, 2021); the composition of the Arbitration Committee (ArbCom) that watches over defending the truth on the platform (Armstrong, 2018); the creation of a register of hoaxes, false information, hoaxes that are published on Wikipedia, a decalogue to combat disinformation (Martínez, 2021); or the peer reviews that some of its most read articles have undergone to demonstrate that they do not contain more errors than those found, for example, in scientific journals (Quian, 2021).…”
Section: Credibility Confidence and Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several policies have been adopted to prevent conflicts of interests among the authors, including a mandatory disclosure of remunerated edits, limitations on the use of multiple accounts (designated as "sock-puppetry") and clear rules regarding the reliability of sources. Wikipedia authors must also follow the encyclopaedia's specific position on the "neutral point of view", embracing pluralism and multi-perpectivity (Sant 2021), yet trying to reflect the relative importance of each viewpoint in the sources. Specific WikiProjects, such as Patrols and the Counter-Vandalism Unit, gather users dedicated to the surveillance of articles and the development of methods (including bots) in order to fight vandalism and problematic edits.…”
Section: Knowledge In the Post-truth Eramentioning
confidence: 99%