How can the educated and, above all, men be preserved for the living faith? How can one prevent the Church from becoming a Church for women and children only?' With these words the Catholic historian Philipp Funk identified one of the central challenges facing Catholics in Germany on the eve of the First World War. 1 Funk had begun his career as a journalist in pre-war Munich and, importantly, served for several years as the leading spokesman for the Krausgesellschaft, a Munich-based Catholic cultural association whose stated organizational goals emphasized the 'deepening of religious life and the fostering of a personal and manly (persönlichen und männlichen) Christianity'. 2 Typical of this emphasis was an unapologetically bombastic manifesto entitled 'More Manliness!' (Mehr Männlichkeit!) that appeared in May 1914 in the group's official organ. Lamenting the alleged preponderance of emotion and sentimentality within the Church and the resultant fact that 'Catholic religious life is at present completely tailored to womanly souls', the article issued an appeal for 'stronger and more manly priests' and closed with a clarion call to Catholics throughout Germany: 'Religion belongs in the hands of men, not women and children!' 3 The Catholic Church in Germany was in deep trouble, the argument ran, and its only salvation lay, in effect, in a massive injection of testosterone. But what was it that moved Funk and his colleagues in the Krausgesellschaft to such hyperbolic language? What larger images and imperatives were driving their religio-cultural activism on the eve of the First World War? And, perhaps more importantly, when referring to the pressing need for more Männlichkeit within German Catholicism, what definitions of masculine identity did these activists envision? european history quarterly