2013
DOI: 10.1080/00094056.2013.774203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Charter Schools Do, and Don't, Inspire Change in Traditional Public School Districts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arguably, there are many ways in which a charter school or charter school policy can induce (or mitigate) change in a public school district, and only one of these avenues is competition (Linick & Lubienski, 2013). If a public school even chooses to respond to a nearby charter school, the possible responses are not limited to competition and may include accommodation, collusion, and cooperation (Ni & Arsen, 2010).…”
Section: The Challenge Of Linking Charter Schools To Competitive Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Arguably, there are many ways in which a charter school or charter school policy can induce (or mitigate) change in a public school district, and only one of these avenues is competition (Linick & Lubienski, 2013). If a public school even chooses to respond to a nearby charter school, the possible responses are not limited to competition and may include accommodation, collusion, and cooperation (Ni & Arsen, 2010).…”
Section: The Challenge Of Linking Charter Schools To Competitive Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the observation that charter school density, proximity, or market share is generating competition because of effects, does not account for any effects that could be generated through choice, autonomy, collusion, or cooperation. Second, the assumption that the presence of charter schools is inducing a competitive response is flawed as institutional factors and environmental factors may prevent a public school district or school from responding (Linick & Lubienski, 2013;Ni & Arsen, 2010). Lastly, though many studies claim charter school "competition" is generating effects, a more accurate description would be that charter school proximity, density, and/or market share is associated with a change of outcomes at district-run schools.…”
Section: The Challenge Of Linking Charter Schools To Competitive Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past three decades, the primary and secondary education landscape in the USA has vastly changed. The establishment of public magnet, charter, and other specialized schools combined with education policies that enhance school choice have resulted in sharp increases in competition within many school districts across the nation (Cremata and Raymond, 2014;Linick and Lubienski, 2013;Foskett, 2012). In addition to having a greater array of choices, consumers are also better informed (Kisida and Wolf, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, the incentives created by the choices in the urban school environment create complex and unpredictable outcomes (Bulkley & Henig, 2015; M. A. Linick, 2014; M. Linick & Lubienski, 2013).…”
Section: Teaching Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%