2012
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2011-2278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Children With Specific Language Impairment View Social Situations: An Eye Tracking Study

Abstract: Children with SLI viewed social situations in ways similar to those of TD children but different from those of children with ASD. However, children with SLI concentrated on the speaker's mouth, possibly to compensate for audiovisual processing deficits. Because eyes carry important information, this difference may influence the social development of children with SLI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
1
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
50
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Eyetracking equipment can be used to record participants’ point of gaze on a moment-by-moment basis, thus recording the patterns of visual attention. This type of technology is beginning to be used in a variety of studies, across diverse etiological categories in the communication sciences/disorders and related fields (e.g., Heuer & Hallowell, 2007; Hosozawa, Tanaka, Nakano, & Kitazawa, 2012; Klin, Jones, Schultz, Volkmar, & Cohen, 2002; Odekar, Hallowell, Kruse, Moates, & Lee, 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eyetracking equipment can be used to record participants’ point of gaze on a moment-by-moment basis, thus recording the patterns of visual attention. This type of technology is beginning to be used in a variety of studies, across diverse etiological categories in the communication sciences/disorders and related fields (e.g., Heuer & Hallowell, 2007; Hosozawa, Tanaka, Nakano, & Kitazawa, 2012; Klin, Jones, Schultz, Volkmar, & Cohen, 2002; Odekar, Hallowell, Kruse, Moates, & Lee, 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies use video presenting realistic social scenes that do not involve the participant (e.g., Hosozawa et al 2012;Klin et al 2002b;Norbury and Bishop 2009;Riby and Hancock 2009;Rice et al 2012;Shic et al 2011;Speer et al 2007), while others are based on controlled videos of a person trying to engage the participant (e.g., Bird et al 2011;Chawarska et al 2013;Jones et al 2008;Nakano et al 2010). Eye trackers are often used to measure whether the observer looks longer or more frequently at one item displayed on a computer screen than another (e.g., Klin et al 2009).…”
Section: Eye-tracking During Video Viewingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffi culties with the integration of auditory and visual speech cues were reported in children with specifi c language impairment (SLI; Pons, Andreu, Sanz-Torrent, Buil-Legaz, & Lewkowicz, 2013) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD; Megnin et al, 2012). On the one hand children with SLI spend more time fi xating the speaking mouth than typical controls, possibly to compensate for auditory processing defi cits (Hosozawa, Tanaka, Shimizu, Nakano, & Kitazawa, 2012). But on the other, the use of visual cues during audiovisual speech integration is known to be less effi cient in children and adults with language-learning disabilities (Norrix, Plante, & Vance, 2006;Norrix, Plante, Vance, & Boliek, 2007).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%