2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-018-3818-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How close is microhabitat and diet association in aquatic ecomorphotypes? A test with tadpoles of syntopic species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
28
0
11

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
28
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…At the finest spatial scale considered, just one microhabitat type explained a small amount of variation in species composition. Availability of potential tadpole food items has been shown to vary among microhabitats in streams (based on another study conducted at streams at the same site [ 65 ]) and food items provide different nutrients for tadpoles, influencing their growth and metamorphosis (e.g. [ 66 67 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the finest spatial scale considered, just one microhabitat type explained a small amount of variation in species composition. Availability of potential tadpole food items has been shown to vary among microhabitats in streams (based on another study conducted at streams at the same site [ 65 ]) and food items provide different nutrients for tadpoles, influencing their growth and metamorphosis (e.g. [ 66 67 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our detailed classification of tadpole microhabitats may have precluded the association of a significant amount of changes in species composition to a single microhabitat type. Besides, microhabitats used by tadpoles greatly overlap in availability of food types [ 65 ]. Thus, only a broad alteration of stream microstructure might be expected to reduce the set of available microhabitats in a way to cause noticeable effects on anuran species composition via decreased resource availability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scientific literature includes a plethora of terms to denote ISD. These include morphotypes (Chavarie et al., 2013 ; Collyer et al., 2015 ; Lessios & Weinberg, 1994 ); ecotypes (Arostegui et al., 2018 ; Cruz‐Font et al, 2019 ; Gregor, 1944 ) species pairs (Taylor, 1999 ); ecomorphotypes (Baker et al., 1998 ; Kloh et al., 2019 ; Segura‐Trujillo et al., 2018 ); ecophenotypes (Proćków et al., 2018 ; Schönborn & Peschke, 1988 ; Sorensen & Lindberg, 1991 ); polymorphisms (Jamie & Meier, 2020 ; Skúlason et al., 2019 ; Skúlason & Smith, 1995 ); and life histories (Stearns, 1989 ; Winemiller & Rose, 1992 ). Several of these terms have common roots and are often used interchangeably or in combination (e.g., Baker et al., 1998 ; Brannon et al., 2004 ; Chavarie et al., 2013 ; Palacios et al., 2012 ; Wood et al., 2008 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tadpoles may reach high abundances (Gibbons et al 2006, Pinero-Rodriguez et al 2020 and have an important ecological role, contributing to nutrient cycling, altering the trophic web, and even causing bioturbation by modifying the distribution of sediments (Costa and Vonesh 2013, Cortés-Gómez et al 2015, Kloh et al 2019. They can potentially decrease food resources, including submerged plant biomass (Arribas et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%