How "Community" Matters for How People Interact With Information: Mixed Methods Study of Young Men Who Have Sex With Other Men

Abstract

BackgroundWe lack a systematic portrait of the relationship between community involvement and how people interact with information. Young men who have sex with men (YMSM) are a population for which these relationships are especially salient: their gay community involvement varies and their information technology use is high. YMSM under age 24 are also one of the US populations with the highest risk of HIV/AIDS.ObjectiveTo develop, test, and refine a model of gay community involvement (GCI) factors in human-information interaction (HII) as applied to HIV/AIDS information among YMSM, specifically examining the role of Internet use in GCI and HII.MethodsMixed methods included: 1) online questionnaire with 194 YMSM; and 2) qualitative interviews with 19 YMSM with high GCI levels. Recruitment utilized social media, dating websites, health clinics, bars/clubs, and public postings. The survey included questions regarding HIV/AIDS–related information acquisition and use patterns, gay community involvement, risk behaviors, and technology use. For survey data, we tested multiple linear regression models using a series of community- and information-related variables as dependent variables. Independent variables included community- and information-related variables and demographic covariates. We then conducted a recursive path analysis in order to estimate a final model, which we refined through a grounded theory analysis of qualitative interview data.ResultsFour community-related variables significantly predicted how people interact with information (HII variables): 1) gay community involvement (GCI), 2) social costs of information seeking, 3) network expertise accessibility, and 4) community relevance. GCI was associated with significantly lower perceived social costs of HIV/AIDS information seeking (R 2=0.07). GCI and social costs significantly predicted network expertise accessibility (R 2=0.14). GCI predicted 14% of the variance in community relevance and 9% of the variance in information seeking frequency. Incidental HIV/AIDS information acquisition (IIA) was also significantly predicted by GCI (R 2=0.16). 28% of the variance in HIV/AIDS information use was explained by community relevance, network expertise access, and both IIA and information seeking. The final path model showed good fit: the RSMEA was 0.054 (90% CI: .000-.101); the Chi-square was non-significant (χ2(11)=17.105; P=.105); and the CFI was 0.967. Qualitative findings suggest that the model may be enhanced by including information sharing: organizing events, disseminating messages, encouraging safety, and referring and recommending. Information sharing emerged under conditions of pro-social community value enactment and may have consequences for further HII. YMSM with greater GCI generally used the Internet more, although they chatted online less.ConclusionsHIV/AIDS–related HII and associated technology uses are community-embedded processes. The model provides theoretical mediators that may serve as a focus for intervention: 1) valuing HIV/AIDS informati...

Exploring the role of sex-seeking apps and websites in the social and sexual lives of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men: a cross-sectional study

“…2 Recently, connection to gay communities has been associated with increased exposure to information about HIV, 3 greater social support and improved psychological wellbeing. 4 Further, social network factors have been shown to have significant effect on sexual health risk.…”

HIV Testing Behavior and Social Network Characteristics and Functions Among Young Men Who have Sex with Men (YMSM) in Metropolitan Detroit

“…Theory suggests that new information can facilitate action in a number of ways that could affect HIV testing behavior, including assisting with decision making [67, 68], problem solving [69–72], and pursuit or coordination of new lines of action [73–75]. Notably, prior research has shown a strong relationship between YMSMs’ HIV-related information acquisition and their involvement in the gay community [76]. However, the potential role of social information acquisition in HIV testing behavior has not yet been examined.…”

Towards a new specialization in health librarianship: LGBTQ health

“…In the case of LGBTQ people, such barriers include a concern that they will experience discrimination, that they will have to out themselves, or that they will experience heteronormative attitudes from a librarian who won't understand their specific information needs. Although many LGBTQ people can rely on the support of their community when negotiating these barriers, it has been recently demonstrated [19] that the same barriers can be more daunting for many men who have sex with men (MSM), who may prefer not to Martin Morris, MSc 1 associate with the broader LGBTQ community due to an unwillingness to sexually identify as gay, homosexual, or bisexual; this information therefore has a higher "social cost" in the words of the author. Such people may therefore have only limited sources of information that they trust.…”