2009
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1275-09.2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Connectivity, Background Activity, and Synaptic Properties Shape the Cross-Correlation between Spike Trains

Abstract: Functional interactions between neurons in vivo are often quantified by cross-correlation functions (CCFs) between their spike trains. It is therefore essential to understand quantitatively how CCFs are shaped by different factors, such as connectivity, synaptic parameters, and background activity. Here, we study the CCF between two neurons using analytical calculations and numerical simulations. We quantify the role of synaptic parameters, such as peak conductance, decay time, and reversal potential, and anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
254
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(264 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(143 reference statements)
9
254
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, cortical neurons are embedded in a complex network, and thus the impacts of surrounding local circuit also have to be considered to explain the interactions between the recorded pair of neurons (Zhou et al, 2008;Ostojic et al, 2009). Indeed, the present triphasic causality dynamics observed for cell pairs with a displaced CCG peak suggests a nonclassical view of the functional connectivity within a cortical local circuit.…”
Section: Cross-correlation and Granger Causalitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, cortical neurons are embedded in a complex network, and thus the impacts of surrounding local circuit also have to be considered to explain the interactions between the recorded pair of neurons (Zhou et al, 2008;Ostojic et al, 2009). Indeed, the present triphasic causality dynamics observed for cell pairs with a displaced CCG peak suggests a nonclassical view of the functional connectivity within a cortical local circuit.…”
Section: Cross-correlation and Granger Causalitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Multiple mechanisms could account for the brain state dependence of inhibition, including short-term plasticity, differences in background noise, synaptic strength, membrane potentials, chloride reversal potential, and/or neuromodulator levels during theta and SO. It indicates that, in a permanent regime of brain activity, synaptic connections are differentially recruited (Ostojic et al, 2009). Our .…”
Section: Principal Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is so when input correlations are not too strong, otherwise the correlations become independent of firing rate (Tchumatchenko et al 2010). Ostojic et al (2009) studied the relationship between the synaptic connections and the correlations of the spike trains, and pointed out that common synaptic input could enhance the correlations of neural firing activity. Further, recent work stated that feed-forward inhibitory circuitry could help to prevent excessive correlations in the face of sensory-evoked activation leading to improved population coding (Middleton et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%