2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How context features modulate the involvement of the working memory system during discourse comprehension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our result adds to the literature by indicating that prediction of upcoming words benefits more from sentence context than from discourse context. This finding is compatible with the findings in previous studies (Myers et al, 2000;Yang et al, 2015;Yang et al, 2018). While those studies did not directly investigate the cognitive process of prediction during language comprehension, they did show that readers need more cognitive effort to integrate long-distance information than shortdistance information in discourse context (Myers et al, 2000;Yang et al, 2015;Yang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Effect Of Contextsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our result adds to the literature by indicating that prediction of upcoming words benefits more from sentence context than from discourse context. This finding is compatible with the findings in previous studies (Myers et al, 2000;Yang et al, 2015;Yang et al, 2018). While those studies did not directly investigate the cognitive process of prediction during language comprehension, they did show that readers need more cognitive effort to integrate long-distance information than shortdistance information in discourse context (Myers et al, 2000;Yang et al, 2015;Yang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Effect Of Contextsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…the entire EEG experiment had been completed. The participants rated the coherence of each mini story on a 5-point scale, ranging from 'not coherent' to 'coherent' (for a similar approach, see Yang, Zhang, Yang, & Lin, 2018). The lists were exactly the same as the ones used in the EEG experiment (see 2.6 Experimental lists), which means that participants rated only one condition of each item.…”
Section: Coherence Rating Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to establish that the 'coherent' and 'incoherent' conditions were indeed considered as such, we conducted a coherence rating test with an additional group of 20 native speakers of Dutch (19 females, average age: 24 years, age range: 18-30 years). In an online experiment, which was done after we had conducted the EEG experiment, these participants rated the coherence of each mini story on a 5-point scale, ranging from 'not coherent' to 'coherent' (for a similar approach, see Yang, Zhang, Yang, & Lin, 2018). The two sentences of each mini story were presented together.…”
Section: Coherence Rating Testmentioning
confidence: 99%