How context influences the functionality of community‐level health governance structures: A case study of community health committees in Kenya

Abstract

Community Health Committees (CHCs) are mechanisms through which communities participate in the governance and oversight of community health services. While there is renewed interest in strengthening community participation in the governance of community health services, there is limited evidence on how context influences community‐level structures of governance and oversight. The objective of this study was to examine how contextual factors influence the functionality of CHCs in Kajiado, Migori, and Nairobi Counties in Kenya. Using a case study design, we explored the influence of context on CHCs using 18 focus group discussions with 110 community members (clients, CHC members, and community health volunteers [CHVs]) and interviews with 33 health professionals. Essential CHC functions such as ‘leadership’ and ‘management’ were weak, partly because Health professionals did not involve CHCs in developing health plans. Community Health Committees were active in the supervision of CHVs, reviewing their household reports, although they did not utilise these data for making decisions. Resource mobilisation and evaluation of health programs were affected by the lack of administrative and operational support, such as training. Despite having influential membership, CHCs could not provide leadership and management functions. Health system actors perceived the roles of CHCs as service providers rather than structures for governance and oversight. Insufficient awareness of CHC roles among health professionals, lack of training and operational support for community‐based activities constrained CHCs' functionality and thus their role in community participation. While there are efforts to institutionalise community‐level governance structures for health at sub‐national level, there is a need to scale‐up these efforts countrywide. We recommend that community‐level governance structures be empowered, mandated, and provided with resources to take on the responsibility of overseeing community health services and exacting accountability from health providers.

Analyzing Primary Healthcare Governance in Indonesia: Perspectives of Community Health Workers

“…Our research has identified interrelated issues among three actors that may negatively affect service quality: (a) deficiencies in active CHWs; (b) a lack of support from Puskesmas; and (c) a lack of leadership among village heads. We consider the concept of governance to be a crucial element in PHC systems, represented by Puskesmas and official community administrators [ 23 , 24 ]. This indicates that systems thinking and strengthening frameworks help us capture the roles of Puskesmas and village heads.…”

“…The examination of village governance also underscores the importance of establishing village committees composed of community representatives [ 24 , 28 , 29 ]. These committees, which typically include community members, public health center staff, and volunteer organization representatives, play a crucial role in decision-making about village affairs, overseeing community health service delivery, and supporting volunteer workers.…”

Examining the Nexus Between Local Governance Structures and College Students’ Cultural Identity and Confidence-Take Zhejiang as an Example

“…Mainstream cultural identity is composed of two factors: public participation and mainstream culture, and national cultural identity is composed of four factors: tolerance, ethnic preference, Ethnic connotation, and religious belief. This study used a questionnaire to conduct an empirical survey on the cultural identity of college students (Karuga et al,2023). Cultural assertiveness is the perception of the culture of the group where people live.…”